Synthesis and Development of Interactive Simulation-Based Learning Activities on Gas Laws

Authors

  • Nattharuja Sokudrua Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University
  • Kwanyuen Leamsamrong Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University
  • Patcharaporn Pimchan Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University
  • Dutchanee Pholharn Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University
  • Somsuk Trisupakitti Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University

Keywords:

Interactive Simulation, Gas Properties, Learning Achievement

Abstract

Background and Aims: The topic of gas properties is highly abstract and complex, so students often find it difficult to understand and may develop misconceptions about the relationships among pressure, volume, temperature, and the number of particles; therefore, active learning activities and interactive simulations such as PhET should be used to help students visualize phenomena, manipulate variables, construct conceptual understanding, and improve learning achievement. The objectives of this research were to: 1) synthesize a conceptual framework for interactive simulation-based learning on Gas Properties; 2) develop learning activity models; and 3) investigate the effects of implementing these models to enhance students' learning achievement.

Methodology: This research employed a Research and Development (R&D) methodology, using the Active Learning approach integrated with Interactive Simulations as the research framework. The target group consisted of 31 science education students at the Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, selected through purposive sampling. The research instruments included: 1) the developed learning activity model, 2) activity sheets, 3) a learning achievement test, and 4) a student satisfaction questionnaire. Data were analyzed using basic statistics, including percentage, mean (M), and standard deviation (S.D.).

Results: The research results were 1) The synthesized conceptual framework, based on the Input-Process-Output (IPO) model, was assessed as highly appropriate by experts 2) The developed learning activity model consisted of six stages: Preparation, Software Tutorial, Simulation Exploration, Variable Correlation Testing, Summary and Discussion, and Post-Learning Assessment 3) The implementation of the model showed that students' post-learning achievement scores were significantly higher than their pre-learning scores. Furthermore, students expressed high levels of satisfaction with the learning management, particularly regarding the benefits gained and the learning media utilized.

Conclusion: The key contribution of this research is the 6-Stage Interactive Simulation (PhET) Learning Model, an innovative and effective approach for enhancing learning achievement, scientific process skills, and positive attitudes toward chemistry for learners in the Digital 5.0 era.

References

Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.Longman.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Brookhart, S.M. (2024). Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers Revisited. Education Sciences, 14(7), 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070751

Bybee, R.W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practical action. Heinemann.

Clark, T.M., & Chamberlain, J.M. (2014). Use of a PhET Interactive Simulation in General Chemistry Laboratory: Models of the Hydrogen Atom. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400454p

Dubson, M., Perkins, K., Adams, W., Finkelstein, N.D., Reid, S., Wieman, C.E., & LeMaster, R. (2006). PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. The Physics Teacher, 44(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2150754

Gagné, R.M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247-264.

Johnstone, A. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 377-379.

Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experience: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Moore, E.B., Chamberlain, J.M., Parson, R., & Perkins, K.K. (2014). PhET Interactive Simulations: Transformative Tools for Teaching Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1191–1197. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4005084

Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191

Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of gas: A cross-age study. Science Education, 65(2), 187-196.

Piaget, J. (1970). Science education and the psychology of the child. New York: Viking Press.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Rahmawati, Y., Zulhipri, Z., Hartanto, O., Falani, I., & Iriyadi, D. (2022). Students’ conceptual understanding in chemistry learning using PhET interactive simulations. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1597

Salame, I.I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the u of PhET simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in general chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wieman, C.E., Adams, W.K., & Perkins, K.K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948

Downloads

Published

2026-09-26

How to Cite

Sokudrua, N., Leamsamrong, K., Pimchan, P., Pholharn, D., & Trisupakitti, S. (2026). Synthesis and Development of Interactive Simulation-Based Learning Activities on Gas Laws. Journal for Developing the Social and Community, 13(3), 707–736. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdirmu/article/view/304283

Issue

Section

Research Articles