QR Code or Virtual Reality (VR) Tools for Enhancing Teachers' Learning

Authors

  • Punlop Khongnurat Ramkhamhaeng University
  • Prapapron Vichayasattra Ramkhamhaeng University
  • Wanida Khamlek Ramkhamhaeng University Demonstration School
  • Wicha Puttanu Ramkhamhaeng University Demonstration School
  • Mattana Ngaopha Ramkhamhaeng University Demonstration School

Keywords:

QR Code, Virtual Reality (VR), Educational Technology, Instructional Design

Abstract

Background and Objective: The world is currently facing rapid and uncertain changes in economic, social, and technological dimensions as societies transition into the era of artificial intelligence (AI). A review of Thailand's current national curriculum, namely the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (2008), revised in B.E. 2560 (2017), indicates that it was developed based on the concept of Standard-based Education, in which learning standards and indicators serve as the primary goals of instructional management. Consequently, instructional media often include activities and traditional paper-based worksheets. However, these conventional learning materials may no longer effectively motivate learners or capture their attention. Therefore, this academic article aims to present and analyze the potential of QR Code (Quick Response Code) technology and Virtual Reality (VR) as innovative tools for enhancing contemporary learning and teaching practices.

Methodology: This study employed analytical and synthetic approaches to examine issues related to human learning, particularly instructional media in the digital era characterized by artificial intelligence. It explored the transformation of traditional teaching materials into tools that facilitate Active Learning. Technologies such as QR Codes and Virtual Reality (VR) can be embedded in instructional documents, worksheets, and teaching content through innovative formats and processes to enrich learning experiences and promote learner engagement.

Results: The findings revealed that QR Code technology offers several advantages, including low implementation costs and flexibility in providing immediate access to a wide variety of online information resources. Meanwhile, Virtual Reality (VR) demonstrates considerable potential for creating immersive learning experiences, enabling learners to visualize and interact with phenomena that cannot be observed directly with the naked eye, such as molecular structures and magnetic fields. Moreover, VR can overcome budgetary constraints through Virtual Field Trips conducted on contemporary platforms such as Google Arts & Culture and the Metaverse. These technologies not only support the achievement of learning indicators prescribed by the Basic Education Core Curriculum but also foster higher-order thinking skills and serve as important tools for integrating learner competencies required in the age of artificial intelligence, particularly those associated with digital learning behaviors. Furthermore, within the context of classroom management aimed at reducing the Digital Divide, Thai teachers are encouraged to integrate digital innovations into their teaching practices and enhance their professional competencies through the effective application of these technologies.

Conclusion: The integration of QR Codes and Virtual Reality (VR) contributes to transforming teachers' roles from creators of instructional materials into lifelong learners committed to continuous professional self-development. Teachers can utilize QR Codes as gateways to diverse online knowledge repositories and employ Virtual Reality (VR) to simulate authentic classroom situations through Classroom Simulations, thereby enabling them to practice instructional management skills and develop the ability to solve immediate classroom problems independently. Therefore, QR Codes and Virtual Reality (VR) should not be viewed merely as instructional media for learners; rather, they represent effective alternatives and powerful tools for strengthening learners' educational experiences while simultaneously empowering teachers' professional development in the future.

References

กุลธิดา ขันทอง. (2563). คุรุสภาวิทยาจารย์ JOURNAL OF TEACHER PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT ปีที่ 1. ฉบับที่ 3 กันยายน – ธันวาคม 2563.

จิรกร ฐาวิรัตน์. (2568). AI กับการศึกษา: ตัวช่วยสุดอัจฉริยะ เพื่อพัฒนาการเรียนรู้. วารสารสังคมศึกษาปริทรรศน์ ปีที่ 1 ฉบับที่ 2 (มกราคม - กุมภาพันธ์ 2568).

นภนวล พรรณภวสันต์ .(2564). Metaverse โลกเสมือนกับสินทรัพย์ดิจิทัล. ฝ่ายส่งเสริมเทคโนโลยีทางการเงินสำนักงานคณะกรรมการกำกับหลักทรัพย์และตลาดหลักทรัพย์ (ก.ล.ต.) จาก https://www.efinancethai.com/LastestNews/LatestNewsMain.aspx?release=y&ref=M&id=dGNBeTFPb1hSZUU9.

Ahmed Hassan Rakha. (2025). Cooperative learning with QR codes technology: enhancing cognitive achievement and attitudes among students. Department of Physical Education and Kinesiology, College of Education, Qassim University,

Buraidah, Saudi Arabia. Digital Education. Volume 10 – 2025.

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.

Akın, E. (2014). Investigation of the Effectiveness of Using QR Code Supported Books. European Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 183-195.

Cheng, V. C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). A review of science learning studies with virtual reality: Potential and limitations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 41-61.

Crompton, H. (2013). A systems view of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E164–E166.

Deschaine, M. E., & Sharma, S. A. (2015). The digital curation process: A model for enhancing academic rigor and digital literacy. TechTrends, 59(4), 17–24.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi. New York.

Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Peer inside the pedagogical model. Computers & Education, 83, 118-122.

Hwang, G. J., Chang, C. C., & Chien, S. Y. (2022). A motivational model-based virtual reality approach to prompting learners’ sense of presence, learning achievements, and higher-order thinking in professional safety training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1348–1365.

Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). Effects of a smartphone-based ubiquitous learning system on students’ learning performances and attitudes in a local culture course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), E82–E86.

Jerowsky, M., & Borda, A. (2022). Virtual reality can support and enhance outdoor environmental education. The Conversation.

Krutka, D. G., Heath, M. K., & Caines, A. (2021). Toward a critical approach to educational technology: Platforms, emancipation, and thriving. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 21(4), 861–881.

Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 943-951.

Li, H. (2022). The effect of VR on learners’ engagement and motivation in K-12 English education. Department of Education, University College London. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 22, 145-158.

Mayer, R. E. (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mystakidis, S., et al. (2021). The impact of virtual reality on student engagement in the classroom–a critical review of the literature. BMC Medical Education, 21, Article 452.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Christophel, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.

Rakha, A. H. (2025). Cooperative learning with QR codes technology: Enhancing cognitive achievement and attitudes among students. Department of Physical Education and Kinesiology, College of Education, Qassim University. Digital

Education, 10, 112-128.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through

virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332–339.

Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted

seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. British Journal of

Educational Technology, 42(2), 232–257.

Yang, K., Zhou, X., & Radu, I. (2020). XR-Ed Framework: Designing Instruction-driven and

Learner-centered Extended Reality Systems for Education. Cornell University.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Khongnurat, P. ., Vichayasattra, P., Khamlek, W., Puttanu, W. ., & Ngaopha, M. . (2026). QR Code or Virtual Reality (VR) Tools for Enhancing Teachers’ Learning . Journal for Developing the Social and Community, 13(2), 391–416. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdirmu/article/view/301682

Issue

Section

Academic Articles