Enhancing Grade 10 Students' Learning Achievement and Collaboration Skills through Socioscientific Issues-Based Learning Integrated with Gallery Walk Activities

Authors

  • Kanokpohn Srithongdang Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University

Keywords:

socioscientific issues, gallery walk, learning achievement, collaboration skills, DNA technology

Abstract

Background and Aims: Promoting students’ ability to connect scientific knowledge with real-world situations while fostering collaboration skills is a key goal of science education in the 21st century. This study aimed to: (1) compare the learning achievement in Biology on the topic of DNA Technology, and (2) compare the collaboration skills of Grade 10 students before and after participating in learning activities based on Socioscientific Issues (SSI) integrated with the Gallery Walk activity.

Methodology: This study employed a pre-experimental research design using a one-group pretest–posttest design. The sample consisted of 80 Grade 10 students enrolled in the Science–Mathematics program in the 2nd semester of 2025 academic year, selected through cluster sampling. The participating classes were organized as mixed-ability classrooms. The research instruments included: (1) five lesson plans based on Socioscientific Issues integrated with the Gallery Walk activity, with IOC ranging from 0.67 to 1.00 and an overall appropriateness at a very good level; (2) a 30-item learning achievement test with IOC 0.67 to 1.00, item difficulty indices (p) 0.40 to 0.64, item discrimination indices (r) ranging from 0.35 to 0.72, and a reliability coefficient (KR-20) of 0.86; and (3) a five-criterion analytic rubric for assessing collaboration skills with IOC from 0.67 to 1.00 and a Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of 0.87. Data were analyzed using the mean, standard deviation, and paired-samples t-test.

Results: The findings revealed that: (1) the students’ post-learning achievement (M = 22.87, SD = 2.57) was significantly higher than their pre-learning achievement (M = 14.51, SD = 2.64) at the .05 level (t = 18.36, p < .001), with a very large effect size (Cohen’s dz = 2.05); and (2) the students’ post-learning collaboration skills (M = 21.09, SD = 1.94) were significantly higher than their pre-learning collaboration skills (M = 13.66, SD = 1.64) at the .05 level (t = 26.68, p < .001), with a very large effect size (Cohen’s dz = 2.98).

Conclusion: Learning activities based on Socioscientific Issues integrated with the Gallery Walk activity were associated with significantly higher post-intervention scores in both learning achievement and collaboration skills. The instructional approach provided opportunities for students to investigate, analyze, exchange ideas, and construct knowledge collaboratively through scientific issues connected to real-world social contexts.

References

ภัทรพงศ์ วิริยะ และวสันต์ สรรพสุข. (2568). การจัดการเรียนรู้โดยใช้ปรากฏการณ์เป็นฐานร่วมกับกลวิธีการเดินชมแลกเปลี่ยนเรียนรู้เพื่อพัฒนาผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนของผู้เรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 6. Journal of Lanna Societies, 3(2), 1–14.

สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี. (2560). ตัวชี้วัดและสาระการเรียนรู้แกนกลางกลุ่มสาระการเรียนรู้วิทยาศาสตร์ (ฉบับปรับปรุง พ.ศ. 2560) ตามหลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551. กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.

อลิษา รัชนิพนธ์, ดวงเดือน สุวรรณจินดา, และนวลจิตต์ เชาวกีรติพงศ์. (2564). ผลของการจัดการเรียนรู้โดยใช้ประเด็นทางสังคมที่เกี่ยวเนื่องกับวิทยาศาสตร์ เรื่อง การถ่ายทอดลักษณะทางพันธุกรรม ที่มีต่อผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนวิทยาศาสตร์และความสามารถในการให้เหตุผลเชิงวิทยาศาสตร์ของนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 3 โรงเรียนเกาะสิเหร่ จังหวัดภูเก็ต. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ, 21(2), 110–123.

Anantpinijwatna, A. (2026). Effects of gallery-walk in process simulation course. South

African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 55, 111–118.

Ayanoğlu, F. B., Elçin, A. E., & Elçin, Y. M. (2020). Bioethical issues in genome editing by

CRISPR-Cas9 technology. Turkish Journal of Biology, 44(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1912-52

Badeo, J. M., & Duque, D. A. (2022). The effect of socio-scientific issues (SSI) in teaching

science: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1340

Che-aron, Z., & Matcha, W. (2023). Project-based learning with gallery walk: The

association with the learning motivation and achievement. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15(5), 1–13.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.

Högström, P., Gericke, N., Wallin, J., & Bergman, E. (2025). Teaching socioscientific issues:

A systematic review. Science & Education, 34, 3079–3122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00542-y

Kumnuanek, O., Aranyawat, U., & Pongsopon, P. (2022). Study of students’ moral

reasoning on modern biotechnology applications using bioethics for informed decision modules. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 511–524.

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.134

Nomsoor, M. M., Bello, G., & Mohammed, S. M. (2021). Effects of gallery walk instructional strategy on senior school students’ achievement in cell division in Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Biology Education, 4(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.21043/jobe.v4i2.10816

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022

assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.

Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle-Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler,

T. D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues-based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26–32.

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and

research. Springer.

Schenk, L., Hamza, K., Arvanitis, L., Lundegård, I., Wojcik, A., & Haglund, K. (2021).

Socioscientific issues in science education: An opportunity to incorporate education about risk and risk analysis? Risk Analysis, 41(12), 2209–2219.

https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13737

Susilawati, S., Aznam, N., Paidi, P., & Irwanto, I. (2021). Socio-scientific issues as a vehicle

to promote soft skills and environmental awareness. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.161

Tan, W. A., & Perrault, S. (2025). Enhancing student engagement through a gallery walk:

Applying multiple strategies to communicate scientific concepts. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 26(2), Article e00207-24.

https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00207-24

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Education for

sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO.

Viehmann, C., Fernández-Cárdenas, J. M., & Reynaga-Peña, C. G. (2024). The use of

socioscientific issues in science lessons: A scoping review. Sustainability, 16(14), Article 5827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145827

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A

research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Srithongdang, K. (2026). Enhancing Grade 10 Students’ Learning Achievement and Collaboration Skills through Socioscientific Issues-Based Learning Integrated with Gallery Walk Activities. Journal for Developing the Social and Community, 13(3), 265–282. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdirmu/article/view/304408

Issue

Section

Research Articles