Integrating CLIL and Project-Based Learning to Enhance Sixth Graders’ English Reading Achievement

Authors

  • Panpaka Boonphoie Faculty of Humanities and Social Science Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University
  • Prayad Bhoomkhokrak Faculty of Humanities and Social Science Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/ajmt.2024.2

Keywords:

The Integrating Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) with Project-Based Learning (PBL) , English Reading Achievement

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the impact of integrating Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) with Project-Based Learning (PBL) on the English reading proficiency of sixth-grade students, and (2) explore student perceptions regarding the effectiveness of these educational methodologies. The study involved 21 sixth-grade students from Prachasamakkee Primary School within the Buaburapa Group, overseen by the Nakhonratchasima Primary Educational Service Area Office, Region 1, who were selected through cluster random sampling. Instruments employed in the study included CLIL and PBL-designed lesson plans, an English reading achievement test, and a questionnaire assessing student opinions. The data were analyzed using mean ( ), standard deviations (S.D.), and          t-test for a dependent sample. The findings indicated a significant increase in the post-test reading achievement scores of the students compared to the pre-test scores (p < .05). Student feedback was predominantly positive towards the combined CLIL and PBL instructional strategies. The study concludes that the synergistic application of CLILand PBL methodologies substantially improves English reading skills among learners.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman.

Chen, Y. (2012). Symposium: The contextualization of teaching and learning English as an international language. Language Teaching, 45(4), 527-530. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000183

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Coyle, D. (2011). Teacher education and CLIL methods and tools. http://www. cremit. it/public/documenti/seminar. pdf.

Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. John Benjamins.

Domalewska, D. (2015). Classroom discourse analysis in EFL elementary lessons. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 6-9.

Eurydice. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Eurydice Unit.

Graddol, D. (2006). English next. http://www.britishcouncil.org/learning-research-english-next.pdf

Huang, Y. C. (2020). The effects of elementary students' science learning in CLIL. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 1-15.

Kim, M. K. (2019). Project-based learning experience in the construction of intercultural knowledge. Modern English Education, 20(2), 1-18.

Lai, H. T. (2014). Learning English as an international language: EFL learners’ perceptions of cultural knowledge acquisition in the English classroom. Asian Social Science, 10(1), 1-11.

Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE-The European dimension: Actions, trends, and foresight potential. DG EAC: European Commission. http://www.phkarlsruhe.de/cms/flieadmin/user_upload/dozenten/ schlemminger/enseignement_bilingue/Marsh-CLIL-EMILE.pdf

Mergendoller, J. R., Maxwell, N. L., & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: a comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics. Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning, 1(2), 49-69.

Pang, E. S., Muaka, A., Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). Teaching reading (Vol. 6). International Academy of Education.

Pinto Ruiz, A. M. (2018). CLIL and reading strategies worksheets to foster reading comprehension [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad Externado de Colombia.

Soparat, S., Arnold, S. R., & Klaysom, S. (2015). The development of Thai learners' key competencies by project-based learning using ICT. Online Submission, 1(1), 11-22.

Suwannoppharat, K. (2014). The development of a content and language integrated learning course to enhance cultural awareness and English communication ability of Thai undergraduates in the international program [Doctoral dissertation]. Chulalongkorn University.

UNESCO. (2012). Education in humanitarian emergencies and conflictsituations’.https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000220416fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR2Qf90AuxiLHlBkvfK9CflKXVNPGM9MarHr1Qa9MBSeSIkj3qOxFvOd6B4_aem_AfOdemZ2qBrrAnvbwWxwasYqldhsz4WNqGfgnsL1s55eUXazPptDMuiVeHKXcYG2p1yPhUXDJiuKTOu46h5IanYf

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26

How to Cite

Boonphoie , P., & Bhoomkhokrak, P. (2024). Integrating CLIL and Project-Based Learning to Enhance Sixth Graders’ English Reading Achievement. Academic Journal of Management Technology, 5(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.14456/ajmt.2024.2

Issue

Section

Research Article