Counseling Experience of Intimate Partner Violence Survivors: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Main Article Content

Sathida Temkulkiat
Chomphunut Srichannil

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to gain insight into the psychological experiences of counseling in intimate partner violence survivors.
Materials and methods: This qualitative research employed the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) method and collected data through semi-structured in-depth interviews ranging from 74-123 minutes. The participants were four women aged 21 to 28 years who had experienced intimate partner violence and sought counseling regarding the relationship.
Results: This article presents two main themes: 1) Experience of counseling increased awareness of the
situation, revealing four subordinate themes: (1) Counseling increased awareness in perception of the
problem; (2) Counseling lessened self-blame; (3) Awareness of what prevents oneself from leaving the
relationship; and 4) Self-conflict leads to avoidance of continuing counseling. 2) Counseling helps with standing up for oneself, consisting of three subordinate themes: (1) Counseling helped create relationship boundaries; (2) Changes resulting from counseling helped end the relationship; and (3) Counseling helped remain stable during the process of ending the relationship.
Conclusion: This research provides an understanding of the psychological experiences of female survivors of intimate partner violence in counseling. The findings have the potential to significantly enhance counselor competence, providing a deeper understanding and more effective strategies for working with women seeking help for intimate partner violence.

Article Details

How to Cite
Temkulkiat, S., & Srichannil, C. (2025). Counseling Experience of Intimate Partner Violence Survivors: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Thai Journal of Clinical Psychology (Online), 56(1), 1–16. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tci-thaijclinicpsy/article/view/282330
Section
Original article

References

Ansara, D. L., & Hindin, M. J. (2010). Formal and informal help-seeking associated with women's and men's experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 70(7), 1011-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.009

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023). Percentage of U.S. adults aged 18 years and older who had received any mental health treatment or medication in the past 12 months in 2020, by age [Graph]. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1193042/share-adults-who-received-anymental-health-treatment-medication-byage-us/

Chuemchit, M., Chernkwanma, S., Rugkua, R., Daengthern, L., Abdullakasim, P., & Wieringa,

S. E. (2018). Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand. Journal of Family Violence, 33, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9960-9

Chang, J. C., Dado, D., Hawker, L., Cluss, P. A., Buranosky, R., Slagel, L., McNeil, M. & Scholle, S. H. (2010). Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: Factors and circumstances leading women victims toward change. Journal of Women's Health, 19(2), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1568

Cho, H., Shamrova, D., Han, J. B., & Levchenko, P. (2020). Patterns of intimate partner violence

victimization and survivors’ help-seeking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21-22),

-4582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715027

Cluss, P. A., Chang, J. C., Hawker, L., Hudson Scholle, S., Dado, D., Buranosky, R., & Goldstrohm, S. (2006). The process of change for victims of intimate partner violence: Support for a psychosocial readiness model. Women's Health Issues, 16(5), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2006.06.006

Cunningham, M., & L. Anderson, K. (2023). Women experience more intimate partner violence

than men over the life course: Evidence for gender asymmetry at all ages in a national sample. Sex Roles, 89(11), 702-717.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01423-4

Eisikovits, Z., Buchbinder, E., & Mor, M. (1998). "What it was won't be anymore": Reaching the

turning point in coping with intimate violence. Affilia, 13(4), 411-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/

Eckstein, J. J. (2011). Reasons for staying in intimately violent relationships: Comparisons

of men and women and messages communicated to self and others. Journal of Family Violence, 26(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896- 010-9338-0

Frasier, P. Y., Slatt, L., Kowlowitz, V., & Glowa, P. T. (2001). Using the stages of change model to

counsel victims of intimate partner violence. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(2), 211-

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00152-X

Lewis, S. D., Henriksen Jr, R. C., & Watts, R. E. (2015). Intimate partner violence: The recovery

experience. Women & Therapy, 38(3-4), 377- 394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2015. 1059223

Marsden, S., Humphreys, C., & Hegarty, K. (2021). Women survivors’ accounts of seeing

psychologists: Harm or benefit?. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 5(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868020X16040863370635

Minto, K., Masser, B. M., & Louis, W. R. (2022). Identifying nonphysical intimate partner violence in relationships: The role of beliefs and schemas. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5-6), 2416-2442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520938505

Murray, C. E., Mobley, A. K., Buford, A. P., & Seaman-DeJohn, M. M. (2007). Same-sex intimate partner violence: Dynamics, social context, and counseling implications. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 1(4), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1300/J462v01n04_03

Nichols, E. M., Bonomi, A., Kammes, R., & Miller, E. (2018). Service seeking experiences of

college-aged sexual and intimate partner violence victims with a mental health and/or

behavioral disability. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1440572

Overstreet, N. M. , & Quinn, D. M. ( 2013) . The intimate partner violence stigmatization model and barriers to help seeking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35( 1) , 109- 122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746599

Paat, Y.-F., & Markham, C. (2019). The roles of family factors and relationship dynamics on

dating violence victimization and perpetration among college men and women in emerging

adulthood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(1), 81-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516640544

Peitzmeier, S. M., Malik, M., Kattari, S. K., Marrow, E., Stephenson, R., Agénor, M., & Reisner, S. L.

(2020). Intimate partner violence in transgender populations: Systematic review and metaanalysis of prevalence and correlates. American Journal of Public Health, 110(9), e1-e14.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305774

Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay?: Three decades of research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(4),391-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-

(97)00025-6

Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.510659

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larskin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis:

Theory, method and research (2nd edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Srichannil, C. (2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: A qualitative methodology for

psychological research. Journal of Education, 28(3), 1-13. https://ojs.lib.buu.ac.th/index.php/

education2/article/view/5611 (in Thai).

Srichannil, C. (2019). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Quality criteria. Chiang Mai University Journal of Humanities, 20(1), 189-213. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/

index.php/JHUMANS/article/view/186561 (in Thai).

Trabold, N., McMahon, J., Alsobrooks, S., Whitney, S., & Mittal, M. (2020). A systematic review of

intimate partner violence interventions: State of the field and implications for practitioners.

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 311-325.https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018767934

Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (1999). Not going back: Sustaining the separation in the process of

leaving abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 5(2), 110-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/