Group Management of Rice Production to Certification for Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) of Collaborative Farming in Makluamai Sub-District, Sung Noen District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to study the context and development of rice production to be certified for good agricultural practices (GAP) and to develop a model for managing rice production groups to be certified for GAP of Collaborative Farming in Makluamai Sub-District, Sung Noen District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Researchers conducted Participatory Action Research approaches by participating with researchers, leaders, and GAP farmers. Researchers conducted Participatory Action Research approaches by participating with researchers, leaders, and GAP farmers. Data were collected using questionnaires, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and knowledge sharing with a sample of 58 people. Data were analyzed using statistics of frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and data synthesis.

The research findings revealed that among the 58 surveyed farmers growing GAP-certified rice, the majority were male (51.72%) and had an education level below secondary school (65.52%). Most were not leaders within the GAP rice farming groups (79.31%), and in the past year, 75.86% had not achieved GAP certification. Regarding the context and production for GAP certification among large-scale rice farmers in Makluea Mai Subdistrict, Sung Noen District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, all farmers used the Jasmine Rice 105 variety. A majority cultivated on sandy loam soil (58.62%), in lowland areas (91.38%), and utilized irrigation water sources (94.83%). All farmers engaged in soil enrichment (100%), with 72.41% applying chemical fertilizers and 70.69% not cultivating soil-enhancing plants. Most farmers practiced rice broadcasting (89.66%) and used combine harvesters for harvesting (100%). Additionally, 91.38% saved seeds for future use, and 72.41% did not sell seeds. The three main factors influencing farmers' decisions to grow GAP rice were: ensuring safety for growers and consumers (94.83%), producing rice for household consumption (91.38%), and supporting government policies (93.10%). Farmers placed high importance on GAP rice management and cultivation practices, with an overall average score of 4.36 (high level). Analysis by category showed that farmers highly valued all aspects, including the safe rice production process (average = 4.27), management (average = 4.32), and good agricultural practices (average = 4.50).
The management model for rice production groups seeking GAP certification comprised two main components: management practices—planning, organizing, leading, and controlling, led by group presidents in collaboration with farmer leaders according to the organizational structure, with personnel assigned specific roles. Activities such as knowledge exchange and monitoring of rice production standards were implemented. Key success factors in group management included leadership, network building, participatory management, and other supportive factors.