DIGITAL ANTHROPOLOGY UNDER THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND THEORY OF TECHNOLOGICAL MEDIATION

Authors

  • Sukamon Mungpattanasunthon University of Phayao

Keywords:

Digital Anthropology, Technological Mediation Theory, Conceptual Framework of Digital Society

Abstract

This article aimed to present evolution and conceptual framework to study Digital Anthropology through the concept of “Technological Mediation Theory”. This idea was to  study and summarise the conceptual frame work of the relations between technology roles to human and society in the previous articles. Therefore, the Technological Mediation Theory has been developed from Phenomenology approach. Martin Heidegger is the original philosopher who presented that the human should aware roles of technology more than being only objects. In contemporary era, the concept has been developed to Post phenomenology. Don Ihde, Peter Verbeek, and Robert Rosenberger are the influential thinker to other scholars in this field. Additionally, the outstanding studies are the influence of Digital Technology that shape or reshape human being and transforming to Digitalization. Generally, Digital Anthropology Studies base on research methodology to investigate the technological roles including Digital technology. Everyday life report is the popular technique that the anthropology chooses to explore social and cultural phenomena, then using the result to discuss and argue the data as Technological Mediation Theory by Don Ihde approaches.

References

สุกมล มุ่งพัฒนสุนทร. (2561). ยุคแห่งสังคม AI: หาก AI มาแทนที่มนุษย์. สืบค้น 26 กุมภาพันธ์ 2561, จาก https://www.stou.ac.th/thai/grad_stdy/Masters/ฝสส/research

Aagaard et al. (2018). Posthenomenological Methodologies. London: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group. Inc.

Boellstorff, T. (2013). Digital Anthropology. Oxford Bibliographies Online. Retrieved February 26, 2018, from https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199766567/obo-9780199766567-0087.xml

Gualeni, S. (2015). Virtual Worlds as Philosophical Tools: How to Philosophize with a Digital Hammer Hardcover. London: Pal-grave MacMillan.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York; London: Garland Publishing.

Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and Technoscience. Edited by Leonore Langsdorf. The Peking University Lectures. Albany: SUNY Press.

Ingold, T. (1997). Eight Themes in The Anthropology of Technology. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 41(1), 106-138.

Kemp, S. (2018). Digital 2018 in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. Retrieved February 26, 2018, from https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018

Miller, D. (2012). Open access, scholarship, and digital anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(1), 385–411.

Mungpattanasunthon, S. (2019). Disruptive Technology reshapes human being, societies, roles and relations: the hypothesis of Technology Mediation. Retrieved February 26, 2018, from http://gscm.nida.ac.th/uploads/files/1550113978.pdf

Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Annu Rev Anthropol. Retrieved February 26, 2018, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8a67/8518d47c0c2e0be4fe2f7b585e4e909ce176.pdf

Powdermaker, H. (1951). Hollywood: The Dream Factory An Anthropologist Looks at the Movie Makers. London : Secker & Warburg. Retrieved February 26, 2018, from https://mediaethnographies.files.wordpress.com2009/08/powderlarge.pdf

Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P.P.C.C. (2015). Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations (Postphenomenology and the Philosophy of Technology). Lanham, MD: Lexington Book.

Think about Wealth. (2019). The statistics of digital user around the world 2019. Retrieved February 26, 2018, from https://www.thinkaboutwealth.com/digitalstatworldthailand2019/

Downloads

Published

2020-03-27

How to Cite

Mungpattanasunthon, S. (2020). DIGITAL ANTHROPOLOGY UNDER THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND THEORY OF TECHNOLOGICAL MEDIATION. Journal of MCU Social Science Review, 9(1), 82–97. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/220829