Dispute Resolution by Mediator with Sappurisa-Dhamma
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dispute resolution through mediation is a well-established process and is widely used by a wide range of organizations, particularly in the courts of justice, where dispute resolution in court is referred to as mediation or conciliation, and the parties to the dispute resolution process. A mediator in court is called a mediator by means of a mediator that allows the disputing parties to negotiate with a third party to help in the negotiation without adjudication or arbitration, and the mediator will only serve to help the disputing parties to negotiate and mediate the dispute in order to find a mutually accommodating agreement until they can settle the dispute with each other well. The dispute resolution process by the mediator in the court is a convenient, rapid, economical, and fair settlement process and also helps to maintain the relationship between the parties to the dispute. In dispute resolution processes by the mediator, it is undeniable that the person acting as the mediator is critical to the success of dispute resolution. The mediator who is equipped with the qualities of a good person is a faithful person according to the seven Sappurisa- Dhammas: knowing the cause, knowing effect, knowing self, knowing moderation, knowing the time, knowing the community, knowing people, known as a person who practices well, has a reason, can act in harmony with the relationship of the people. Dispute parties who have conflicts are able to reconcile with each other are not difficult, to promote dispute resolution processes through mediation to achieve results in accordance with the intent of peaceful dispute resolution.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Dispute Resolution Office of the Court of Justice. (2012). Code of Ethics of Mediator. Bangkok: Thanaplace Company Limited.
Notini, J. (2022). Effective Alternatives Analysis in Mediation: “BATNA/WATNA” Analysis Demystified. Retrieved September 9, 2022, from https://www.mediate.com/articles/notini1.cfm
Lopburi Provincial Court. (2022). How important is dispute mediation? Retrieved October 19, 2022, from https://lbrc.coj.go.th/th/file/get/file/20200527d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e124149.pdf
Surachet, M., Wongthip, W., & Yooprasert, P. (2022). Dispute Resolution, Retrieved September 9, 2022, from https://www.stou.ac.th/schools/slw/upload/40205-13.pdf
Office of Judicial Promotion Office of the Court of Justice. (2016). Advice for Mediators. (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Active Print Company Limited.
Office of the Court of Justice. Dispute Resolution Office. Alternative Dispute Resolution Center. (2013). Techniques, Psychology and Communication. For Mediation of Disputes Version 1.4. Bangkok: Office of Dispute Resolution Office of the Court of Justice.
Phra Brahmagunabhorn (P. A. Payutto). (2016). Dictionary of Buddhism. Retrieved October 19, 2022, from https://www.watnyanaves.net/uploads/File/books/pdf/dictionary_of_buddhism_pra-muan-dhaama.pdf
Yooprasert, P. (2022). Overview of Dispute Resolution with Mediation/Mediation Techniques and Strategies for Breaking Through the Stalemate. Retrieved October 19, 2022, from http://www.peaceinhealth.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/stop.pdf
Nuyimsai, W. (2018). “A Model of the Mediation by Buddhist Peaceful Means: A Case of the Mediation Center of Lawyers Council, Bangkok”. (Doctoral Dissertation). Graduate School: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyala University. Ayuttahya.