Research and Development of Innovative Teaching to Raise the Quality of Production and Develop Teachers to the Future World
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were 1) to create and find quality of learning models to promote innovative teaching skills, 2) to study innovative teaching skills after using the model. The Teaching Model was developed based on Joyce, Weil and Calhoun’s systematic approach. Samples used in this study were 150 pre-service teachers, selected by purposive selection. Data were analyzed by ANOVA.
The results of the research was that the Teaching Model to promote Innovative teaching skills consisted of 6 parts: 1) learning principles and theories, 2) objectives, 3) teaching process, 4) social system, 5) response principle and 6) support system. The teaching process consisted of four steps: 1) goal identification, 2) applying technology, 3) create innovation and 4) learning management. The results from the implementation of the Teaching model revealed that pre-service teachers’ innovative teaching skills had higher development at .05 level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Anderson, L.W. A. (2001). Taxonomy for Learning Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Education Objectivcs. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
At the Meeting of the President of Rajabhat Universities Nationwide. (2017). The New Strategy of Rajabhat University to Develop Local According to The Royal Patronage. Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bellanca, J. A. (2010). 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn. United States: Solution Tree Press.
Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century. United States: Corwin.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (2013). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning. New York: Routledge.
Chareonwongsak, K. (2013). Creative Thinking. Bangkok: Success Media.
Division of Research Administration and Educational Quality Assurance. (2017). Thailand 4.0 Model Drive of Thailand Towards Stability, Wealth and Sustainable. Bangkok: Division of Research Administration and Educational Quality Assurance.
Edwards, A. (2012). New Technology and Education. London: A&C Black.
Garrison, D. R. (2015). Thinking Collaboratively: Learning in a Community of Inquiry. New York: Routledge.
Innovation and Business Skills Australia (IBSA) Australia. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Developing Innovation Skills: A Guide for Trainers and Assessors to Foster the Innovation Skills of Learners Through Professional Practice.
Jain, L. C. (2013). Innovative Teaching and Learning: Knowledge-Based Paradigms. Physica.
Joyce, B., M. Weil & E. Calhoun. (2014). Models of Teaching. (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Khammanee, T. (2010). Pedagogy: Knowledge for Organizing Effective Learning Process. Bangkok: Publisher of Chulalongkorn University.
Knirk, F.G., B., & K. L. Gustafson. (1986). Instructional Technology: A Systematic Approach to Education. Florida: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ministry of Education. (2019). Ministry of Education Announcement on Undergraduate Qualifications Standards Department of Education (Four Years Course) 2019.
Morad, S., Ragonis, N., & Barak, M. (2014). Innovative Thinking and ICT Expertise of Undergraduate Students in Education. Learning in the Technological Era: Proceedings of the 9th Chais Conference for the Study of Innovation and Learning Technologies, 112-120.
Mugione, F., & Penaluna, A. (2018). Developing and Evaluating Enhanced Innovative Thinking Skills in Learners. In Entrepreneurial Learning City Regions (pp. 101-120). Springer, Cham.
Nussbaum-Beach, S., & Hall, L. R. (2012). The Connected Educator: Learning and Leading in a Digital Age. Unite States: Solution Tree Press.
Office of Higher Education Commission. (2017). Education in Thailand B.E. 2560-2579. Bangkok: Prigwan Graphic Co., Ltd.
Phusee-orn, S. (2018). Educational Research and Development. Mahasarakham: Taksila Printing.
Shekar, A. (2013). Teaching Innovative Thinking and Consumer-Oriented Design to Engineering Students: Perspectives Based on Observations and Experience. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 41(1), 14-16.
Srisa-ard, B. (2010). Preliminary Research. ( 8th ed.). Bangkok: Suwiriyasan Printing.
Sutthirat, C. (2010). 80 Innovative Learning Management That Focuses on the Learners. (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Danex Intercorporation.
Varnhagen, et al. (2010). Teaching, Research, and Discovery Learning: Recommendations for a Great University. Teaching, Research, and Discovery Learning, 1-16.
Wisetsat, C. (2022). Research and Development of Innovation Skills for Thai Youth to Support Their Careers in the Future. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 10(2), 497-508.
Wisetsat C., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Synthesis of Innovative Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Education Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, 6(1), 451-464.
Wisetsat, C., et al. (2019). The Results of Data Analysis on the Need of Enhancement Pre-Service Teachers’ Innovative Teaching. Buabandit Journal of Educational Administration, 19(4), 357-371.
Zhu, C., Wang, D., Cai, Y., & Engels, N. (2013). What Core Competencies Are Related to Teachers' Innovative Teaching?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 9-27.
