Exploratory Factor Analysis of Innovative Potential in Grade 10 Students

Main Article Content

Kanwisa Tharaworn
Taviga Tungprapa
Ittipaat Suwathanpornkul

Abstract

The research article aimed at analyzing exploratory factors of innovative potential of the 4th secondary school students. It is a Documented research. A sample group included 560 students of the 4th secondary school under Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Secondary Education Service Area Office, who were chosen by multi-stage sampling. The research tool was innovative potential measurement form with a 5-point Likert scale. Principal component analysis and Varimax rotation were used to analyze the collected data for exploratory factor analysis.  


From the study, it is found that innovative potential consists of 3 components and 17 indicators which are: the first component refers to innovative creativity with 7 indicators including fluent thinking, flexible thinking, thorough thinking, critical thinking, associative thinking, and problem-solving; the second component refers to innovative operation with 4 indicators including experiment, improvement, collaboration with others, and communication; and the third component refers to innovation personality including 6 indicators including observation, inquisitiveness, curiosity, mental strength, courage, decision-making, and determination for success. The variance is equal to 63.919 which each component describes the variance at a percentage of 50.849, 7.170, and 5.899, respectively. 


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Tharaworn, K., Tungprapa, T. ., & Suwathanpornkul, I. . (2022). Exploratory Factor Analysis of Innovative Potential in Grade 10 Students. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 10(5), 2215–2228. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/261757
Section
Research Articles

References

Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., & Hastings, J. T. (1971). Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bykova, Y. A., & Istomina, S. V. (2018). Perceptions of the Innovative Potential of Students by Teachers of General, Secondary Vocational and Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 10(8), 2030-2033.

Dyer, J. Gregersen, H., Christensen, C.M. (2011). The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.

Engel, K. Dirlea, V., Dyer, S., & Graff, J. (2015). Best Innovators Develop a Point of View on the Future and a Roadmap on How to Get There. Strategy and Leadership, 43(2), 15-22.

Klochko, V. Y., & Galazhinsky, E. V. (2009). Innovative Potential of Personality: Systemic Anthropological Context. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2, 210-224.

Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551. Bangkok:

Agricultural Cooperative Society of Thailand Co., Ltd. Printing House.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2018). Guidelines for Quality Assessment According to Educational Standards, Early Childhood, Basic Education, and Basic Education of the Special Education Center, 2018. Retrieved May 3, 2019, from http://bet.obec.go.th/ index/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/nn3.pdf.

Office of the Education Council. (2019). National Education Standards in 2018. Nonthaburi: 21st Century Co., Ltd.

Office of the National Economics and Social Development Council. (2017). The Summary of the Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan During 2017-2021.

Retrieved April 5, 2019, from https://www.nesdb.go.th/download/plan12.pdf.

Patterson, F., & Zibarras, L. D. (2017). Selecting for Creativity and Innovation Potential: Implications for Practice in Healthcare Education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(2), 417-428.

Rogers, Everett M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed).The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Shutenko, E., & Shutenko, A. (2015). Socio-Cultural Trends in the Development of the Higher School's Innovative Potential. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 332-337.

Siribanpitak, P. (2018). Thai Education in the 21st Century: Challenges in Educational Research. Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.

Sutthawart, W. (2015). Development of Program for Reinforcing The Educational Innovator Potentiality. (Doctoral Dissertation). Silpakorn University. Bangkok.

Sutthawart, W., & Siriwong, P. (2015). The Basic Educational Innovator in Public Sector: A Study for Grounded Theory. Veridian E-Journal, 8(2), 281-300.

Yangsuksathaporn, P., & Tangtherasunan, P. (2016). The innovator's method. Bangkok: Arrow Multimedia.