Cooperation Network Model in the Administration of Secondary Schools
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article consisted of the following objectives: 1) to investigate status and requirements of cooperation network in the administration of secondary schools; 2) to create cooperation network model in the administration of secondary schools; 3) to experiment cooperation network model in the administration of secondary schools; and 4) to assess cooperation network model in the administration of secondary schools. A sample group included 234 directors of secondary schools, who were chosen by purposive sampling. A target group included the following: 9 experts in the administration of cooperation network in secondary schools, who were chosen by purposive sampling; 50 persons from Sri Nakorn Ajcha Cluster 8 under Surin Secondary Educational Service Area Office, who were chosen by purposive sampling; 21 experts and relevant persons, who were chosen by purposive sampling. The tools used were a questionnaire, an interview form, and an assessment form. The statistics used were percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
From the study, the following results are found: 1) The overall performance status of the cooperation network in secondary school administration is overall at a high level, with cooperation to develop teachers and personnel having a high level of mean; 2) The cooperation network model in the administration of secondary schools comprises 4 aspects which are (1) network to develop learning process, (2) network to make educational development plan, (3) network to develop teachers and personnel, and (4) network to support educational resources; 3) From experimenting cooperation network model in the administration of secondary schools, the result found to be overall at a high level, with the network improvement and development, and learning process development having the highest level of mean; and 4) From assessing the cooperation network model in the administration of secondary schools by experts in educational management, the model found to be of high propriety, feasibility, and utilization.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Boonsuea, T. (2013). The Participative School Management Model for Schools in Lopburi Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Journal of Research and Development of Buriram Rajabhat University, 8(2), 44-50.
Chantanam, R. (2014). Effective Participatory Academic Administration Model in Medium-Sized Schools. (Doctoral Dissertation). Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University. Ubon Ratchathani.
Chomchuan, P. (2012). Effective Community Participatory Academic Administration Model in Educational Institutions under the Office of Primary Education Service Areas. (Doctoral Dissertation). Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University. Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat.
Homsuwan, C. (2013). The Development of Participatory Management Model for Colleges in the Vocational Education Commission. (Doctoral Dissertation). Naresuan University. Phitsanulok.
Jamjantawong, J. (2010). Development of a Network Management Model to Promote Quality Education in Basic Educational Institutions under the Bangkok Educational Service Area Office. (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok.
Krommung, A. (2011). The Model of Small School Network Management to Improve the Quality of Education in the Ubon Ratchathani Educational Service Area Office District 1. (Doctoral Dissertation). Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University. Ubon Ratchathani.
Ministry of Education. (2007). Change Leadership Development Course To Support Decentralization for Education Administrators and School Administrators. Nakhon Pathom: National Institute for Development of Teachers, Faculty Staff and Educational Personnel.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2007). Approach to Decentralization of Administration and Education to the Board Educational Service Area Office and Educational Institutions in Accordance with the Ministerial Regulations Determining the Rules and Methods for Decentralization of Administrative and Educational Administration, B.E. 2007. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Rucharoen, T. (2006). Forms and Elements of Formats. Documentation for Training on Lecture of the Seminar in Educational Administration, Ubon Ratchathani: Prince of Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University.
Srichana, Y. (2015). The Development of the Participation Model for Informal Education Management in Secondary School under the Office of Basic Educational Committee. Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University, 9(4), 153-162.
