Development of Educational Innovation Management Strategies in Education 5.0
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article consisted of the following objectives: 1) to investigate the desirable and current conditions of educational innovation management in the era of education 5.0; 2) to develop the strategies of educational innovation management in the era of 5.0; and 3) to experiment the strategies of educational innovation management in the era of 5.0. The study used a qualitative research method, with data collected by the following methods: 1) Conducting in-depth interviews with five experts in educational management and innovation who were chosen through purposive sampling based on predetermined criteria. Content analysis was used to examine the data; 2) Conducting focus group discussions to analyze the settings and develop strategies, using data collected from twelve experts in educational management and innovation. The tools used were SWOT analysis table and TOWS Matrix. Content analysis was used to examine the data; and 3) Experimenting the strategies of educational innovation management at Triam Udom Suksa Pattanakarn School, Pranburi province. The data were collected by recording the outcomes of the experiments. Content analysis was used to examine the data. In terms of quantitative method, the sample group consisted of 181 schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office in the Central Region. The data were collected from 362 school directors and teachers. A sample group was determined by stratified random sampling. The tools used were questionnaires. Statistics were percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Priority Needs Index Modified (PNImodified).
From the study, the following results are found: 1) The overall, and in each aspect, desirable conditions of educational innovation management in the era of education 5.0 are at the highest level ( = 4.64). The overall, and in each aspect, current conditions of educational innovation management in the era of education 5.0 are at a high level (
= 4.06). The priority needs index included management innovation (PNImodified = 0.18), with measurement and evaluation innovation (PNImodified = 0.18) coming in last; 2) Curriculum innovation, instruction innovation, teaching media innovation, measurement and evaluation innovation, and management innovation are the five educational innovation management strategies in the 5.0 era. There are additionally fifteen other secondary strategies; and 3) The results of experimenting strategies revealed that they are feasible, proprietary, accurate, and useful, as well as efficient. All of them can be implemented.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Bhakdinarinath, S., & Osatis, C. (2018). Model of Social Management Innovation and Thailand 4.0 Policy. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 23(1), 49-59.
Chamchoy, S. (2012). Concept of Innovation for School Management in the 21st Century. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 14(2), 117-128.
Chanruam, R. (2017). Dual System School Management Innovation Base on the Concept of Career-Related Programed. (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok.
Chatwattana, P. (2021). Creative Educational Innovations Based on Experiential Learning to Enhance Education of Digital Learners. Journal of Industrial Education, 20(1), C1-C9.
Edward, W. D. (2018). The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. (3rd ed.). London: Massachusettys Institute of Technology.
Hanafee, Y. (2019). Guidelines for Promote Innovative Leadership of Teacher at Samkhok School under the Pathum Thani Provincial Administration Organization. Journal of Educational Administration and Leadership, 31(8), 332-340.
Healermans, & De Witte. (2012). The Role of Innovations in Secondary School Performance: Evidence from a Conditional Efficiency Model. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 541–549.
Heemadam, F., & Buosonte, B. (2021). The Creative Designing of Learning Measurement Innovation. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal, 5(1), 16-26.
Ingard, S. (2021). Online Learning Management Affecting the Continuing Learning Intention in a New Normal of Undergraduate Students. MUT Journal of Business Administration, 18(1), 28-45.
Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. In C. Reigeluth, (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
Khamchoo, L. (2015). Strategies for the Management of Innovation and Educational Technology in 59 School Network, Bangplat, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok.
Lhaosrirattana, S. (2016). Guidelines for the Development of the Courts of Justice under the Office of the Courts of Justice, Region XII towards an Innovative Organization. SSRU Graduate Studies Journal, (12)3, 43-59.
Morakul, R. (2017). A Factor Analysis of Innovative Organization of School in the Basic Education. (Doctoral Dissertation). Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University. Nakhon Pathom.
Namburi, S. (2019). Innovation and Administration. The Journal of Research and Academics, 2(2), 121-134.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2018). National Strategy 2018-2037. Bangkok: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council.
Patpol, M. (2018). Curriculum Assessment for Learning and Development. Bangkok: Fastbooks.
Phramaha Yothin Mahaviro (Massuk). (2021). Teaching Strategies for Social Studies in the Context of the Digital Economy. Journal of Buddhistic Sociology, (6)3, 89-104.
Silarat, P. (2016). Education 4.0 Is More than Education. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Siririn, J. (2019). Innovation Management Take the School to Education 5.0. Retrieved September 5, 2019, from https://www.salika.co/2019/09/05/innovation-management-educational-5-0era/
Sirisereewan, A., & Chaemchoy, S. (2021). Current and Desirable Conditions and Needs of Academic Management Development for Private Primary Schools in Bangkok Based on the Concept of People Skills in Society 5.0. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal, 15(2), 171 – 182.
Tonghom, J. (2017). Develop of Online Curriculum to Enhance Creative Innovation Skills. (Doctoral Dissertation). Srinakharinwirot University. Bangkok.
Watthanmongkol, W. (2018). The Crisis of Education in the Thailand 4.0 Era. MBU Education Journal, (6)1, 427-444.
