Buddhist moral code: The Role of Mediator by Buddhist

Main Article Content

Vipat Patthanasin

Abstract

This research article seeks to reflect Dhamma principles that promote mediator duties by investigating scriptures, documents, and the perspectives of Buddhist scholars related to principles, concepts, theories and methods of mediation. All of this is intended to analyze and highlight the guidelines and practices that are the identity based on the Buddhist principles. From the study, it is found that the concept of mediation is presently widely employed, with one acting as a mediator in assisting the mediation in order to reach a compromise among the conflicting parties. This approach helps in lowering the expense of the legal procedure and litigation, as well as conserving time and maintaining both parties' relationships. A mediator must act freely and voluntarily, with no authority of decision-making. A mediator's role requires neutrality, positive attitudes, respectable behavior, and the ability to preserve secrets, etc. According to Buddhism, the role of a mediator is to help conflicting parties control their emotions, decrease unwholesome roots, and urge them to think rationally. Such action requires the following Dhamma components: 1 principle which is mindfulness; being aware, contemplating, cautious, prudent; 4 elements which are the Four Developments (Bhāvanā); physical development, moral development, emotional development, and intellectual development; 29 methods which are the Dhamma index; which is the Dhamma sub-topic. When Dhamma is practiced, it results in role and duty that become a way of life, which will contribute to being the Buddhist mediator who is whole and efficient in all aspects.

Article Details

How to Cite
Patthanasin , V. (2022). Buddhist moral code: The Role of Mediator by Buddhist. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 10(2), 845–857. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/259831
Section
Articles

References

Chokkae, S. (2013). Mediation of Disputes according to Dharma Principles in Buddhism. Cited in Alternative Dispute Resolution Center. Dispute Resolution Office, Office of the Court of Justice. Principles of Religion and Dispute Mediation, Version 1.2. Bangkok: Active Print Company Limited.

Dispute Resolution Office, Office of the Court of Justice. (2004). Dispute Resolution Manual for People. Bangkok: Jirarat Printing.

Dispute Resolution Office, Office of the Court of Justice. (2004). Mediator Advice Book. Bangkok: The Court of Justice.

Dispute Resolution Office, Office of the Court of Justice. (2007). Mediation by Mediators Course Training Documents for the Train the Trainer. Bangkok: Office of the Court of Justice.

Dispute Resolution Promotion Division, Rights and Liberties Protection Department, Ministry of Justice. (2020). Knowledge Guide of Dispute Resolution. Nonthaburi: Goodluxe and Jane Co., Ltd.

Knowledge Center of Alternative Dispute Resolution, Dispute Resolution Office, Office of the Court of Justice. (2007). Management of Mediation System in Court. Bangkok: Thana Press Co., Ltd.

Kongsamut, P.. (2022). Live with love. Retrieved May 3, 2022, from https://84000.org/tipitaka /book/bookpn07.html

Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. (1996). Thai Tripitakas. Bangkok: MCU Press.

Permpool, S. (2014). The Model of the Buddhist Inegrated Mediation: The Alterantive Dispute Resolution office of the judiciary. (Doctoral Dissertation). Graduate School: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Ayutthaya.

Phabmeechai, B.S. (2004). The Proceedings of Conciliation: Comparative Study between Thai Law and Lao P.D.R. law. (Master's Thesis). Thammasat University, Bangkok.

Phisutthiphan, C. (1975). Methods for Dispute Resolution by the Peace of the United

Nations. (Master's Thesis). Thammasat University. Bangkok.

Phra Dhampiṭaka (P.A.Payutto). (2003). Dissolving Conflict. Bangkok: Sahathhamik Co., Ltd.

Phra Dhampiṭaka (P.A.Payutto). (1999). Look at World Peace through the Background of Globalization Civilization. Bangkok: Sahathhammak Co., Ltd.

Thapwong, C. (2007). Mediation of Disputes in Court. In Conflict Management and Dispute Resolution, Introduction to Dispute Resolution. Dispute Resolution Office, Office of the Court of Justice. Bangkok: Thana Press Co., Ltd.

Thapwong, C. (1996). Differences in the role of Judge and Mediator. In Civil Disput Resolution

by Mediating Disputes in order to Cause a Compromise in Court. M.P.: m.p.

The Government officer Development Institute for Judiciary of the Court of Justice. Problem of Conflict for Mediation and Conciliation in Court of First Instance. Documents for Academic Seminars for Mediation. N.P.: n.p., n.d.

The Royal Academy. (2005). Dictionary of the Royal Academy 2011. Bangkok: Nanmeebooks Publication.

Tiansongjai, C. (2007). Mediator Negotiations in Theravada Buddhism Study : The Case of Conflict among Kosambi Monks. (Doctoral Thematic Paper). Graduate School: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Ayutthaya.

Wannalu, S. (2006). The Application of Doctrines of the Sublime State of Conduct to Settle Disputes on Criminal Cases : A Case Study of Yasothon Court. (Master's Thematic Paper). Graduate School: Mahamakut Buddhist University, Nakhon Pathom.

Wasi, P. (2002). Peace Means and Human Rights. Bangkok: National Human Rights Office.

Yuprasert, P. (2005). Collection of Articles on Mediation and Conciliation. N.P.: n.p.