The Priority Needs of Curriculum Quality Management of the Faculty of Education Rajabhat University Based on the Concept of Discovery Skills
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to study the priority needs of curriculum quality management of the Faculty of Education Rajabhat University based on the concept of discovery skills. A quantitative methodology was applied in this research. The population were 38 Rajabhat Universities across Thailand. The sample were 38 Faculty of Education of Rajabhat Universities, selected by applying stratified random sampling as well as simple random sampling. The respondents were 178 people including head of the department, curriculum advisors and students. The research instrument was a 5 scale-ratings questionnaire. The data were analyzed by using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and priority needs index.
The results were ranked in order and discovered that the priority needs of the aspects of facilities and infrastructure (PNIModified = 0.068) was the highest, followed by output and outcomes (PNIModified = 0.068) and expected learning outcomes (PNI Modified = 0.062), respectively. When it comes to discovering skills, the research found that the highest priority need was experimenting skills (PNI Modified = 0.068), followed by idea networking skills (PNIModified = 0.064) and questioning skills (PNI Modified = 0.057), respectively.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Banchong, A. (2012). Thinking School. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Burke, A. (1999). Communication & Development: A Practical Guide. London: Social Development Division Department for International Development.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Dharakorn, C. (2014). The Dance from Concept of Trilaksana In Buddhism. (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok.
Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H., & Chistensen, C. M. (2011). The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
Harkins, A. M. (2008). Leapfrog Principles and Practices: Core Components of Education 3.0 and 4.0. Futures Research Quarterly, 24(1), 1-15.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Kringkaew, N. (2008). Enhancement of Experimental Skill and Scientific Attitude Using Experiment Activities in Science Club. Ubon Ratchathani Province. (Master’s Thesis). Ubon Ratchathani University. Ubon Ratchathani.
Pactic, L. (1995). The Constructivist Learning Model. The Science Teacher, 56(June 1995), 413.
Sahney, S., Banwet, D.K., & Karunes, S. (2008). An Integrated Framework of Indicies for Quality Management in Education: A Faculty Perspective. The TQM Journal, 20(5), 502-519.
The American Association for the Advancement Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Veerapot, L. (1998). Quality Control ISO 9002. Bangkok: Pow Voon Printing Limited Partnership.
