Knowledge Management Model of Modern Administrators to Improve the Quality of Education in Phrapariyattidham School, General Education Section
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article consisted of the following objectives: 1) to study the current conditions and problems; 2) to create a model; 2) to experiment a model; and 4) to assess a model. The study applied mixed-methods research and was divided into 4 phases as follows: 1) to study the current conditions and problems, in which a sample group was acquired by mean of simple random sampling and consisted of administrators and teachers from 134 Phrapariyattidhamma schools in general education department; 2) to create a model and have it examined by 11 experts; 3) to experiment a model in which a target group was 1 educational institute; and 4) to evaluate a model in which a target group comprised 21 administrators, teachers, and related persons. The research instruments were questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The statistics used were percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis. From the study, the following results are found: A knowledge management model consists of 5 components which are: 1) Principles comprise 1. lifelong learning, 2. change management, 3. participation, and 4. learning exchange; 2) The objectives comprise 1. the administrators and teachers are able to apply the guidelines of knowledge management and 2. educational institutes are able to apply the new way of learning; 3) The procedures comprise 1. the determination of knowledge, 2. knowledge acquisition, 3. systematic knowledge management, 4. knowledge codification and refinement, 5) knowledge access, 6) knowledge exchange, and 7) learning which consists of 3 sub-components, namely, 7.1) cooperation, 7.2) communication, and 3) the use of digital technology; 4) Assessment guidelines comprise 1. success assessment and 2. satisfaction assessment; and 5) The success conditions comprise 1. an awareness of the importance of knowledge development and 2. becoming a learner who actively participates in the improvement of the quality of knowledge management.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Alan, F. (2010). Knowledge Management-tools. Retrieved October 19, 2020, from http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/.
Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2017). Using knowledge management systems: A taxonomy of SME strategies, International Journal of Information Management, journal home page. Retrieved October 19, 2020, from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/internationaljournal-of-information-management.
Chakphithak, N. (2016). Knowledge management theory. Bangkok: Odeon Store.
Eisner, E. (1976). Education Connoisseurship and Criticism: Their Form and Functions in Educational Evaluation. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10(3/4), 135-150.
Janyaphaiboon, S. (2012). Model of Quality Assurance Development in Educational Institutions under Secondary Education Service Area Office District 29. (Doctoral Dissertation). Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat Institute. Ubon Ratchathani.
Knowledge Management and Development Office: Public Organization. (2016). Handbook and Modern Management Techniques in accordance with Good Country Management Guidelines. Nonthaburi: Sahamit Printing.
Kongsawatkiat, K. (2010). Documents for lectures Knowledge management. (3rd ed). Bangkok: Ratanatri.
Phosri,P., & Werapanyo,P. (2018). The Educational Administration in the 21st Century. Journal of Educational Review Faculty of Education in MCU, 4(1), 80-91.
Meesri, N., & Tawata, A. (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Creativity of Support Employees Silpakorn University. Veridian E-Journal Silpakorn University, 11(2), 21-34.
Ministry of Education, Office of the Education Council. (2016). Thai Educational Conditions 2016/2017: Thailand's Education Reform Guidelines for Thailand 4.0 Era. Bangkok: Prigwarn Graphics Co., Ltd.
Naipinit, A. et al. (2014). AdT justment Under Globalization. Academic Journal of Songkhla Rajabhat University, 7(1), 1-12.
Namprasertchai, S. (2015). Knowledge Management. Bangkok: SE-EDUCATION. Office for Accreditation and Quality Assessment. (2011). Criteria and methods of external quality assessment of basic education institutions. Bangkok: Offset Plus Co., Ltd.
Office of the Basic Education Commission, (2017). Driving Thai Secondary Education 4.0 for Work in the 21st Century. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Society of Thailand Co., Ltd.
Panich, W. (2005). Knowledge management and Thai public administration. Retrieved April 15, 2019, from. http://www.person.ku.ac.th/training/kukm/article/1097206195-1.pdf.
Panich, W. (2016). Building Learning for the 21st Century. (2rd ed). Bangkok: S. Charoen Printing.
Phasukjeet, P. (2007). Knowledge Management: Driven edition. (3rd ed). Bangkok: Yaimai.
Phophakdee, P. (2010). Development of a juristic school management model: Under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok.
Senge, P. (2006). The leader’s new work: Building learning organizations. Retrieved October 19, 2020, from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781315250601/leadership-perspectives-alan-hooper.
Sukhakul, P. (2004). Personnel administration of Phrapariyattidham School: Department of General Education under the National Office of Buddhism School Group 2. Retrieved October 19, 2020, from http://www.thaithesis.org/detail.php?id=1162547000355.
