Human Security in Rights, Fairness and Equality through the Perspectives of Lesbians in Thai Society
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research are: 1) to Study the security of human rights, justice, and equality through the perspective of the lesbian community in Thai society. 2) Explore strategies to address the challenges related to human rights, justice, and equality in Thai society, from the perspectives of the lesbian community. 3) Examine policy and legal frameworks to enhance fairness and equality for the lesbian community in Thailand, within the context of Thai society. This was qualitative based research, including in-depth interviews were employed to collect data from the key informants who are lesbian couples living together for at least 4 years, aged between 25 - 50 years. The data analysis was conducted by thematic analysis.
The results of the study on the security of human rights among the lesbian community are as follows: Regarding rights, it was found that the laws do not adequately grant equal rights to the lesbian community as equal citizens. For example, they do not have the right to register their same-sex relationships. In terms of justice, it was found that their relationships are not recognized, which affects their rights, particularly in regards to marriage. In terms of equality, it was found that they do not receive equal treatment compared to heterosexual individuals, including the recognition of their gender identity. The study suggests that the government should align its policies and regulations with international human rights standards, specifically addressing the relevant issues outlined in international agreements. It also emphasizes the need for accurate knowledge and understanding within society, and collaboration with the private sector to use the law as a means of protecting and promoting the rights of diverse gender identities and eliminating discrimination.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Anderson, T. L. (2002). Practical Ethics Series: Rawls’ Social Contract: Justice as Fairness. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=th&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Anderson%2C+T.+L.+%282002%29.Rawls%E2%80%99+social+contract&btnG=,1-4
Kongsawat, N. (2015). A Study of the Interaction Effects between Gender and Generation Affecting Fashionable Shoes Making Decision of the Consumers in Chonburi Province. (Master’s Thesis). Burapha University. Chonburi.
Link, B. G., Mirotznik, J., & Cullen, F. T. (1991). The Effectiveness of Stigma Coping Orientations: Can Negative Consequences of Mental Illness Labeling Be Avoided? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32(2), 302-320.
Nitiwana, C., & Leerasiri, W. (2017). Promotion of LGBT Human Rights in the United States during the Obama Administration (2009-2016). Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, 8(1), 1-32.
Owen, T. (2010). “Human Security: A Contested Contempt”. In the Rutledge Handbook of New Security Studies. London: Rutledge.
Payaksee, S. (2017). Inequalities of Rights with Sexual Diversity. Documents for Academic Conferences (Proceedings) the 16th Graduate Student Network Seminar in Sociology and Anthropology Academic Year 2016 During 29-30 June 2017. (pp. 903-914). Phitsanulok: Naresuan University.
Sooksom, A. (2016). Human Rights to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Thai Legal System. Bangkok: Thammasat University.
Sudha, M. (2007). Human Security: Concept and Practice. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2478/1/MPRA_paper_2478.pdf
Sukrarerk, P. (2003). Sex Education: The Science of Learning about Sex. Bangkok: Hmorchawban.
Thepthein, B. (2008). The Relationship of Homosexuals Life. Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.
