Educational Management for Students Identity Development in the Higher Education Institutions of Monks, Chiang Mai Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article consisted of the following objectives: 1) to investigate the student monk identities in monastic higher education institutions in Chiang Mai; and 2) to explore the educational management guidelines for promoting student monk identities in monastic higher educational institutions in Chiang Mai Province. The study employed a mixed-method approach, with three administrators from Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University's Chiang Mai campus and three from Mahamakut Buddhist University participating in an interview. A questionnaire was also used to collect data from 100 student monks from monastic higher education institutions who were chosen by simple random sampling. The quantitative data were analyzed using percentages, means, and standard deviations, while the qualitative data were analyzed using the descriptive approach.
From the study, the results are found as follows:
1) The student monk identities in monastic higher education institutions in Chiang Mai should possess the following quality: (1) respectable posture; (2) current world events awareness; (3) leadership skills; (4) volunteer spirit; (5) self-improvement; and (6) community and social development.
2) The educational management guidelines for promoting student monk identities in monastic higher educational institutions in Chiang Mai Province found as follows: (2.1) The level of identity promotion achieved through the educational management process in all six aspects are: (1) lecturers; (2) curriculum; (3) instructional methods; (4) instructional media; (5) venue and environment; and (6) student monk activities; all of these six aspects have a high level of promotion, (2.2) The educational management guidelines for promoting identities are as follows: (1) the development of lecturers' knowledge and comprehension of the university's identity, as well as their morality, ethics, and ability to set a positive example; (2) The design of curriculum to emphasize the practice of tranquil meditation as well as social change so that students can live in society in a meaningful way; (3) The learning management that focuses on knowledge and morality and is practical; (4) The educational innovation that fosters digital citizenship by focusing on the use of digital media and online retrieval; (5) The arrangement of the venue and environment that supports learning parks and connects learning to real-world phenomena; and (6) The learning arrangement that emphasizes social responsibility and public citizenship based on Buddhist ethics.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Brown, S. (2004). Assessing Learners in Higher Education. London: Kogan.
Bhanthumnavin, D. & Bhanthumnavin, D. (1995). Ego Identity System in Thai Youth. Journal of Psychology. 2(1), 76-79.
Government Gazette. (2019). Educational Innovation Area Act A.D.2019, (26 April A.D.2019). Government Gazette Rule Number 136 Pages 102-120 Section Number 56 A. Retrieved October 28, 2020, from http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2562/A/056/ T_0102.PDF
Hall, S. E., & Sears, S. J. (1997). Promoting Identity Development in the Classroom: A New Role for Academic Faculty. Journal on Excellence in College Teachin,. 8(3), 3-24.
Jantanukul, W. (2018). The Wisdom Heritage: The Common Social and Cultural Identity of the ASEAN Regions of Thailand, Laos and Cambodia. Journal of MCU Peace Studies. 6(3), 953-969.
Kegan, R. K. (1982). The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kegan, R. (1994). In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kroger, J. (2004). Identity and Adolescence: The Balance Between Self and Other. (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University Chiang Mai Campus. (2020). Philosophy/ Vision/Mission/Strategy of Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University Chiang Mai Campus. Retrieved October 15, 2020, from https://cm.mcu.ac.th/about_ vision.php
Mahamakut Buddhist University Lanna Campus. (2020). Mission of Mahamakut Buddhist University Lanna Campus. Retrieved October 15, 2020, from http://lanna.mbu.ac.th/ %e0%b8%9e%e0%b8%b1%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%98%e0%b8%81%e0%b8%b4%e0%b8%88-%e0%b8%a1%e0%b8%ab%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%a7%e0%b8%b4%e0% b8%97%e0%b8%a2%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%a5%e0%b8%b1%e0%b8%a2%e0%b8%a1%e0%b8%ab%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%a1/
Mangkhang, C. (2017). Ideology: Social Studies Curriculum for All. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Office of Nation Education Standards and Quality Assessment. (2019). Quality Assessment Manual Outside the Fourth Round of Tertiary for Educational Institutes (Updated May 2019). Bangkok: Mission to Assess and Certify Higher Education Institutions.
Office of the Education Council. (2017). National Education Plan A.D.2017-2036. (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Office of the Education Council.
Rich, Y., & Schachter, P. E. (2012). High School Identity Climate and Student Identity Development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 218-228.
Sri-iam, S. (2011). Student Identity Development in Higher Education Institutions. (Doctoral Dissertation). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Sripraschayanon, S., Phra Maha Phanuwat Pathipanamethi, & Upasod, A. (2019). The Process of Creating Student Model According to Student’s Characteristics in University. Journal of Buddhist Studies. 10(2), 346-360.
Torres, V., Jones, R. S., & Renn, A. K. (2009). Identity Development Theories in Student Affairs: Origins, Current Status, and New Approaches. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 577-596.
Wannapaisan, C. (2017). Research Methodology for Social Studies: Principle and Application. Chiang Mai. Krongchang Printing Company Limited.