Thai Language Instruction Model Based on Sociolinguistics: New Dimension of Instruction
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article consisted of the following objectives: 1) to develop and acquire a quality Thai language instruction model based on sociolinguistics in order to increase students' abilities to create work in higher education; and 2) to acquire the effectiveness of Thai language instruction model based on sociolinguistics in order to increase students' abilities to create work in higher education by the following procedures: 2.1) comparing the pretest and posttest of Thai instruction learning achievement based on sociolinguistics; and 2.2) investigating the development of students who got a Thai language model based on sociolinguistics in creating work in order to increase students' abilities to create work in higher education. The study employed research and development by way of mixed-methods research. The population and group sample consisted of 30 bachelor degree students in their fourth year who were enrolled in the course "foreign languages in Thai language" in the second semester of the academic year B.E. 2563, who were chosen by cluster sampling. The tools used for the study comprised instruction model, manual, instruction management plan, instruction achievement test, and assessment form testing the ability to create work. The obtained data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation, t-test, and content analysis.
From the study, the results found as follows: 1) A model called ‘5A Model’ consists of 4 components including principles, objectives, procedures for carrying out activities, measurement and evaluation; 2) The sample group's learning achievement on the posttest was higher than on the pretest, with a statistical significance of. 05 level; and 3) The development to create work was higher.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Anantaworasakul, A. (2003). Regional Studies: Thai Culture. Bangkok: Pajera Publishing.
AnchaleeNukul, S. (2005). Thai Word Wystem. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn Printing House University.
AppakitSilpasarn, Phraya. (2005). Thai Language Principles. 13th edition. Bangkok: Thai Wattana Panich.
Beers, S.Z. (2011). Teaching 21st Century Skills: An ASCD Action Tool. Virginia: ASCD.
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally College.
Ellison, M.B. (1995). Creative Problem Solving Through Design Education: An Experimental Study. Canada: Mount Saint Vincent University.
Joyce, B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, E. (1996). Model of Teaching. 5th ed. London: Ally n and Bacon.
Khaemmanee, T. (2010). Teaching Science: Knowledge for Organizing a Learning Process That Has Performance. 12th edition. Bangkok: Sutthakat Checkpoint.
Linton, Ralph. (1969). The Tree of Culture. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
Nilphan, M. (2012). Educational Research Methods. Issue 6. Nakhon Pathom: Research and Development Center Education Faculty of Education Silpakorn University.
Prasithrathsint, A. (2001). Social Linguistics. Bangkok: Printing House Chulalongkorn University.
Royal Academy. (2003). Dictionary of the Royal Institute of Thailand 1999, Bangkok: Nanmee Books Publications.
Treffinger D. J. & Isaksen, S. G. (2008). “A New Renaissance? Preparing Productive Thinkers for Tomorrow’s World”. Creative Learning Today, 15(4), 1.
Tylor, Edward B. (1981). The Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology Philosophy Religion, Language, Art and Custom. London: Murray.
