School Adminstrative Manaement Model of Buddhist Thailand Quality Award Under Secondary Educational Service Area Office 42
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article consisted of the following objectives: 1) to study the conditions of school administration; 2) to create a school administration model for Buddhist Thailand Quality Award; and 3) to assess a school administration model for Buddhist Thailand Quality Award. The study applied both quantitative and qualitative researches. The study was divided into 3 phases: 1) The 1st phase was to study the conditions of school administration with 15 key informants by means of semi-structured interview and content analysis; 2) The 2nd phase was to create a school administration model for Buddhist Thailand Quality Award with 11 key informants consisting of (1) 2 Buddhist experts, (2) 2 experts on a model which are school administrators or higher educational administrators with doctoral degree, (3) 6 educational administration specialists which are educational administrators and secondary school administrators/ directors by means of focus group discussion. The research instruments were a school administration draft model for Buddhist Thailand Quality Award and a focus group discussion recording form. The obtained data were analyzed by content analysis; and 3) The 3rd phase was to assess a school administration model for Buddhist Thailand Quality Award with 15 key informants. The research instrument was an assessment form testing accuracy, propriety, feasibility for practice and utility. The statistics used were mean and standard deviation (S.D.). 1) The results from studying the conditions of school administration, there are 7 aspects found as follows: (1) Leadership, (2) Strategy, (3) Students and Stakeholders, (4) Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management, (5) Workforce, (6) Operation, and (7) Outcome. 2) The results from creating a school administration model for Buddhist Thailand Quality Award, it is found that all 7 aspects are integrated with the principles of Dutiyapāpanika Sutta (qualities of a shopkeeper) will result in 78 methods. 3) The results from assessing a school administration model for Buddhist Thailand Quality Award under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 42 overall are at a high level.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Bennette, J., & O'Brien, M. (1994). The building blocks of the learning Organization. Training, 31(6), 41-49.
Gary, Y., & Tracey, J. (1997). Consequences of Influence Tactics Used with Subordinates. Peersand the Boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525-535.
Gold, S. E. (2000). Community organization at a neighborhood high school: promises and dilemmas in building parent –educator partnership and collaboration. Proquest Digital Dissertation, 60 (7), 295.
Kinkade, D. A. (1996). Factors That Affect a School-based Management Team’s Ability to Make and implement Teaching and Learning. (Doctoral Dissertation). Harvard University. Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ingrid, P. (2001). Going global: Preparing our students for interconnected world. Dissertation Abstracts International.
Lauzon, N., & Begin, S. (2007). Developing a strategy to enhance school principal credibility, Teaching Leaders to Lead teachers: Educational Administration in the Era of Constant Crisis Advances in Educational Administration, 10.n.p.
Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. (1996). Thai Tripitakas. Bangkok: MCU Press.
Muenkota, R. (2014). Model of Strategic Planning in Changing Management of Secondary School Administrators in International School Project. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Eastern Asia. Bangkok.
National Degree Enhancement Institute, Ministry of Industry. (2019). TQA Criteria for Performance Excellence Framework 2020 –2021, 1-9.n.p.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (2019). GDP, fourth quarter of 2018Year 2018 and trends for 2019.
Phra Chinnawat Kingkaew. (2018). Development of the 5th Group Pariyatttham School Management Model To excellence. Eau Heritage Journal, 4(2), 162-170.
Phra Maha Suphot Sumetho. (2015). The Development of Effective Educational Administration Model Based on Buddha-Dhamma of General Education. Journal of Yanasangvorn Research Institute, 6(1), 9-24.
Supasopon, C. (2008). Development of academic administration model based on working principles asbasic school team. (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University.Bangkok.
Siriwal, D. (2014). Guidelines for implementing word-class standard school policy into practices in primary schools under the office of basic education commission. (Doctoral Dissertation). Kasetsart University. Bangkok.
Secondary Educational Service Area Office42, (2019). Basic Educational Quality Development Curriculum Documents organization and regulations for. (1st ). Nakhonsawan Secondary Educational Service Area Office42.
The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. (2017). Government Gazette.
Tosikai, T. (2013). Strategic Leadership Development of Primary School Administrators in accordance with the Principles of Second Papani Sutta in Nakhon Sawan Primary Educational Service Area Office1. (Doctoral Dissertation). Mahachulalongkorn University. Ayutthaya.
Yildirim, A., Bastug, L. (2010). Teachers’ views about ethical leadership behaviors of primary school directors. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4109-4114.