Paradigm and the Caring of Terminal Stage Patient: An Analytic, Appreciative and Applicative Study

Main Article Content

ลัดดา ไทยปรีชา
Kiriti Bunchua
Metha Harimtepatip

Abstract

Although current patient care is primarily founded on postmodern philosophy, when confronted with illnesses, both caregivers and patients have varying views based on diverse paradigms. As a result, the researcher is questioning whether the moderate postmodern philosophy can be used with terminally ill patients. The study aims at analyzing, appreciating, and applying the care of terminally ill patients based on moderate postmodern philosophy. The study adopts the dialectical method, which is the process of exchanging ideas with people who believe in postmodern philosophy and the researcher as well as those who support the researcher's position. The obtained data are analyzed by content analysis.


From the study, it is found that the opposing side holds that because it is a trustworthy and international process, the care of terminally ill patients must only apply postmodern philosophy. However, the researcher believes that the care of terminally ill patients should apply moderate postmodern philosophy because postmodern philosophy ignores ethics in caring and impedes creative thinking, whereas moderate postmodern philosophy promotes critical thinking and encourages both caregivers and patients to exercise four powers namely creativity, adaptability, cooperation, and seeking. This includes adhering to the three types of courage in order to achieve the highest goal in life and being able to accept illness as it is.

Article Details

How to Cite
ไทยปรีชา ล., Bunchua, K., & Harimtepatip, M. (2022). Paradigm and the Caring of Terminal Stage Patient: An Analytic, Appreciative and Applicative Study. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 10(6), 2374–2383. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/250679
Section
Research Articles

References

Amaritwarin, S. (2017). Sufficiency Economy Philosophy and Authentic Happiness According to Reality. SSRU Graduate Studies Journal, 8(2), 1.

Bunchua, K. (2008). Ethics Handbook Based on International Principles. Bangkok: Chain Printing.

______. (2014). 84,000 Dhamma Khandhas are for Scholars, Not for Educators. SSRU Graduate Studies Journal, 7(1), 1-15.

______. (2016). Authentic Happiness from Wisdom Awareness Self. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from: https://thamdimisukh.wordpress.com/2017/07/31/.

Harimthepatip, M. (2017). Duty to Be Done. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from: https://www. gotoknow.org/posts/643080

Kant, I. (1969). The Moral Law. Translated by H. J. Paton. London: Hutchinson University Library.

Makmee, P. (2019). The Development of Life Skills in Critical Cognitive Skills of Student in the Vocational. The Journal of Factory of Nursing Burapha University, 27(3), 11.

Phra Paisal Visalo. (2015). The Body is Sick but the Mind Is Not Sick. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from: https://www.facebook.com/visalo/posts/1285618634798784

Rungnoei, N. (2016). Health Assessment: A Holistic Approach. Nontaburi: Tanapress.

Sangkanjanawanich, W. (2016). Analysis of Medical Engagement in Quality of Life: New State of Better Society. (Research Report). Bangkok: Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.

Sangkanjanawanich, W. & Suwanbandit, A. (2016). Medical-People Engagement: Philosophical Approach. Journal of Siriraj Radiology, 1(3), 63-70.

World Health Organization. (2002). National Cancer Control Programmes: Policies and Managerial Guidelines. Geneva: World Health organization.