Academic Administration Strategies of Small- Size Schools Under Buriram Educational Service Area Office
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to 1) create academic administration strategies. 2) implementation of academic administration strategies for Small-Size Schools. And 3) evaluate of suitability, possibility, and usefulness of strategies. Mixed methods designs were adopted. The table of Crazy and Morgan was used to determine the sample size. 196 participants. The experts were asked to create academic administration strategies, by Multi - Attribute Consensus Reaching (MACR). Target groups were 3 group, of 3 persons in each group and doctoral degree all of them got. The first is the policy maker group. The directors from Service Area Office, Group 2 was practitioner group as school administrator who has experience in managing a small academic administration strategies. Group 3 was academic group with experience in developing strategies, Collected data were analyzed by using mean, standard deviation, and content analysis.
The research result found that: 1. Academic administration strategies. issues; divided into 14 strategies, with 46 measures. 2. The strategic constructions result to implement of 2 small size-schools; The result found that; 4,5, and 10 strategies were approach strategies, 1 and 2 strategies were Dissemination strategies and 3,6,7,8,9,11,12,13 and 14 strategies were corrective strategies. The strategies were practiced and modified into working, Team works, Promote management by using networking and participation. and adjustment of measurement and evaluation. The production and development of media that can be applied locally available materials to create value, knowledge and understanding, to strengthen the academic community that demonstrates participation, meeting the needs and importance of parents and communities. 3. The evaluation strategic that a feasibility at a high ( = 4.50, S.D.=0.52) suitability are at a higher level ( = 4.63, S.D.=0.48) and usefulness are at a high level. ( = 4.25, S.D.=0.55)
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Boonkua, S. (2011). An analysis of academic administration leadership of administrators in model schools using the basic education core curriculum. Chulalongkorn University.
Bulbon, P. (2011). Development of an academic administration model of basic education institutions to prepare students for global citizenship.
Chulalongkorn University.
Chaowachai, S. & Chatruprachewin, C. (2018). Strategies for administering a provincial scout club 238 Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of Graduate School. Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University. 12(2), 581-595. [in Thai]
Chaisooksung, S. (2014). Academic Administration Strategies to Promote 21st Century Skills of Students in Alternative Schools.The degree of Philosophy Program , Educational Administration. Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Chan-urai, N. (2011). The Development of the Model for Utilization of External Evaluation Results for Quality Improvement of Small-Size Schools in Northeastern Thailand : An Application of Organization Development Research. commission (Doctoral dissertation). Mahasarakham University.[in Thai]
Jabbung, C. (2011). Developing model for efficiency in education following a strategyto develop the small school by participatory action researchingoffice of the basic education commission (Doctoral dissertation). Chonburi:Burapha University. [in Thai]
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496-528.
Miller, V. (1965). Administration of American School. NewYork : Mc Millan pubishing. [in Thai]
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017). Guide to the operation of a good school near the home (magnet). Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand.
Phraelai, M. (2011). An Analysis Of Factors Effecting the Educational Quality Assurance Management Of Small – Sized School. Commission. CHulalongkorn University (Doctoral dissertation) [in Thai]
Portin, B, Schneider, P, DeArmond, M. & Gundlach, L. (2003). Making sense of leading schools: A study of the school principalship.Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
Ruebling, C . E.,Stow, S .B.,Kayona, F. A., & Clarke, N. A. (2004). Instructional leadership:An essential ingredient for improving student learning. The Educational Forum, 68, 243 - 252.
Thanasomboon, S. (2009). Education Quality Development of Small School Under The Office of Khon Kaen Educational Service Area. An Independent Study Report. KhonKaen University. [in Thai]
Thipkun, J. Sakpakornkan, N and Bunkanan. P. (2021). Academic Administration Strategic of Small- Size Schools Under Education Service Area office. proceedings (NIRC IV2021). Buriram Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
