การเสริมสร้างความร่วมมือในการกำกับดูแลการแข่งขันในสังคมยุคข้อมูลข่าวสาร
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
This research article aims to find practical and effective ways to encourage cooperation in regulating competition among relevant authorities in Thailand. This research project is a qualitative research composing of documentary research, focus group and hearing.
Technology advancement, new business models, particularly online businesses, gradually affect competition regulation. Some new businesses are uncertain whether to be regulated by which regulators because of their complex integrated services. Regulators face constraints in getting information under the control of other regulators. Lacking necessary and adequate information often lead inability to enforce the laws. Regulating competition among the rapid change of business environment is a challenge for regulators. Without cooperation with other relevant regulators, only one regulator may not effectively regulate and enforce the law. The study found that there are differences between cooperation issues among Thai regulators and those of foreign regulators. The cooperation between foreign regulators is workforce integration with the more systematic rules, procedures, working process, clearer timeframe and more practical implementation of working plan comparing to cooperation between Thai regulators. This study proposes the recommendations on how to enhance cooperation between competition regulators that are appropriate to the context of Thai society, which is the use of combination between informal and formal cooperation.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2019). ACMA Overview. Retrieved June 14, 2019, from https://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/About/Corporate/Structure-andcontacts/the-acma-overview-acma/.
Competition and Markets Authority. (2013). Towards the CMA –CMA Guidance. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212285/CMA1_-_Towards_the_CMA.pdf
Department of Justice. (2013). The Communication Act of 1934. Retrieved August 17, 2019, from https://it.ojp.gov/privacyliberty/authorities/statutes/1288./
Federal Communications Commission. (2019). What We Do. Retrieved May 11, 2019, from https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/what-we-do./
GOV.UK. (2019). UK Competition Network. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/uk-competition-network/.
Groshinski, K., & Davies, C. (2015). Competition Law on Asia Pacific :A Practical Guide. United States: Kluwer Law International.
Info-communications Media Development Authority of Singapore. (2019). Frameworks and Policies. Retrieved May 5, 2019, from https://www.imda.gov.sg/regulations-licensingand-consultations/frameworks-and-policies/.
Hilke, J.C. (2006). Improving Relationships Between Competition Policy And Sectoral Regulation. Retrieved May 5, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/prosecutionandlawenforcement/38819635.pdf
Malaysia Competition Commission. (2017). MyCC’s First Special Committee Meeting on Competition For 2017”, News Release. Retrieved May 8, 2019, from https://aseancompetition.org/read-news-myccs-first-special-committee-meeting-on-competition-for2017
Maltas, A. et al. (2016). Competition Law in Asia-Pacific A Guide to Selected Jurisdictions 2018 : Singapore. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https//:www.oecd.org /daf/competition/Competition-Law-in-Asia-Pacific-Guide2018.pdf.
Practitioner’s Perspective. (2018). The Antitrust Source. Retrieved August 11, 2019, from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/antitrust_source/aug16_maltas_8_5f.authcheckdam.pdf.
Miller, V. (2011). Understanding Digital Culture. London :SAGE Publications.