Attitude, Cognizance, Behavioral Trend and Participation in Protection the Evidences Effect to Efficiency of the Mitigation Foundation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were 1) to study the opinion level of cognizance, behavioral predisposition and participation in the evidence protection to Effecting of the mitigation foundation; and 2) to study and analyze the related factors of cognizance, behavioral predisposition and participation in the evidence protection to effecting of the mitigation foundation. This research employed a mixed method combining a quantitative and qualitative research methods. In the quantitative research component, the sample consisted of 336 Foundation Staffs in Nakhon Pathom province obtained by sampling technique. The sample size was calculated by Taro Yamane. Data were obtained with the use of a questionnaire and analyzed by structural equation model. In the qualitative research component, in-depth interview were conducted with 12 key informants including specialist with knowledge and experience with keeping evidence in crime scene investigation, obtained by purposive sample. Data were analyzed by content analysis. The research findings showed that 1) the opinion level of attitude, cognizance and effecting were at a highest level and behavioral predisposition and participation in the evidence to be at a high level and 2) The most influential variable related to operational efficiency was the participation in evidence protection. The overall analysis found the coherence index was more consistent with the empirical data. It was followed to the benchmark to represents the consistency of the model and the empirical data with the standard to be very good. The research results obtained from the qualitative research were consistent with the quantitative research results.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Allen, R., & Santrock, J. W. (1993). Psychology: The Contexts of Behavior. USA.: Wm. C. Brown Communication.
Arnstein, S.R. (1995). Classic readings in urban planning. A Ladder of citizen participation. In J.M. Stein (ed.), New York : McGraw-Hill.
Boonchaloemwipas, S. (2012). Forensic Medicine and Medical Law. Bangkok: Winyuchon Publication House.
Chamsuwannawong, A. et al. (2009). Forensic science 1 for crime investigation. (6thed). Bangkok: G.B.P Center.
Chiamjetcharoon, J. (2007). Crime scene and biological evidence. Academic document. Central Police Forensic Science Division, Office of forensic science.
Deming, W. E. (1940). The Original Quality Gurus. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from http://www.businessballs.com/dtiresources/quality_management_gurus_theories.pdf.
Hobson, C. B. (1991). Fire Investigation a new concept. Illnois: Charles C. Tomas Publisher.
Newcomb, (1854). Attitude. Retrieved March 25, 2018, from http://www.novabizz.Ace/Attitude.html.
Suwannasang, K. (2001). General Psychology. (5thed). Bangkok: Aksornwittaya.
Tongtavee, J. (2018). Understanding and opinions of Pitakkarn foundation rescue officers on protection and preservation of physical evidence at crime scenes. (Master’s thesis). Silpakorn University. Bangkok.
