The Role of Sangha’s in the Promotion of Political Culture in CLMT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) to study the role of sangha’s in the promotion of political culture in CLMT. 2) to analyze and compare the similarities and differences of role of sangha’s in the promotion of political culture in CLMT. 3) to analyze trends of role of sangha’s in the promotion of creative political culture 4) to present the role of sangha’s in the promotion of political culture that should be in Thai society. This research was the qualitative research method collected by documentary, in-depth-interview and focus group discussions. The research had 3 phases. The first phase was to use document research based on the context of each country. The second phase was to use comparative analysis of similarities the role of sangha’s in the promotion of political culture in CLMT. between history and the present. The third phase was to use collect data from the in-depth interviews with 21 key informants and focus group discussion with 10 scholars and experts. The data were analyzed from all three phases by using contextual content analysis techniques and data with triangulation techniques. The findings of the first phase were found that the role of sangha’s in the promotion of political culture there were 4 factors. The findings of the second phase were found that similarities the role of sangha’s in the promotion of political culture in CLMT. between history and the present there were 8 factors. The findings of the third phase were found that trends of role of sangha’s in the promotion of creative political culture there were 4 factors.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Copelend, L., & Lawrence, L. (Eds.). (1985). The World’s Great Speeches. (2nd ed.) New York: Dover.
Easton, D. (1960). The Political System. New York: Alfred A. Knof.
Kenaphoom, S. (2014). The Influences of Political Utility Affecting the Democratic Political Decision, Central Northeast, Thailand. Journal of MCU Peace Studies. (5) 2, 1-19.
Lasswell, D. H., & Kaplan, A. (1970). Power and Society. New Haven: Yale University.
Mayo, H. B. (1976). An Introduction to Semocratic Theory. Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
Neumann, S. (1995). Modern Political Parties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Phra Maha Phisit Satayawut. (1999). The role of monks in rural development. Case study: PhraThep Simaphorn and rural development in Nakhon Ratchasima. Bangkok. Mahidol University.
Phra Sophonkanaporn (Rabab Thithayano). (1985). History of Buddhism. Bangkok: Sivaporn.
Phra Suthiworayanan (Narong Chittasophano). (2006). Buddhist Science Periscope: Combining academic works about Buddhism. Bangkok: Healthy mind.
Phramaha Wisit Dhiravangso. (2019). Development of the Competency of Sangha Administrators in Surin Province. Journal of MCU Buddhapanya Review, 4(1), 169-180.
Phuttha Dot Com. (2019). Knowledge of monks. Retrieved Janury 3, 2019, from https://www.phuttha.com/
Raksamueng. (2018). The Dhammadhipateyya : The Ideal Of Creating Balance For State Sovereignty, Journal of MCU Social Sciences, 7(4), 150-157.
Ranny, A. (1972). Essay on the Behavioral Study of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Schecter, J. (1967). The new face of Buddha: Buddhism and Political power in Southeast Asia. London: Victor Gollancz.
Suksamran, S. (1979). Buddhism and politics, Journal of Social Sciences. 16(4), 1-2.
Wolin, S. (1960). Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. New Jersey: Princeton.
