The Politics in Populism Policy in Thailand B.E. 2544-2557
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to study foreign populist policy, to study factor to incurred political populism in B.E. 2544-2557, and to study political in administration populist policy of the government in B.C. 2544-2557. The process is applied qualitative research to study policy from the academic document and in-depth interview form the sample as follows: group 1 is politician including group support and group resist, group 2 is government official, group 3 is an academician. The finding has the populist policy in foreign and in Thailand were similar to emphasized on lower class with the poor promotion policy and different with Thailand is strong and has fiscal discipline more than a foreign country. Furthermore, the factor is occurring Thai political populism B.E. 2544-2557 as follows: changing the power structure of the political system to decrease the role of the military. The announcement of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2540 to creates political stability by developing into a two-party system. Moreover, the economic conditions after the economic crisis in B.E. 2540, using populist policies to solve social inequality, poverty, and infrastructure restoration for people. Indeed, political in the administration of populist policies of the government during the period B.E. 2544-2557 found that each government implemented policies along with seeking benefits, lack of responsibility, until leading to differences in political ideologies. Therefore, Thailand should prepare readiness and create clarity of populist policies in various dimensions. To determines the scope of appropriately and effectively populist policies.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2012). A political theory of populism. British: Oxford University Press.
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2013). A political theory of populism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 771-805.
Angtrakul, R. (1991). The Project to Create a Rural Work with Thai Rural Development. Parliament Letter, 39 (July).
Bahr, D. (2017). How Sparta became. Spartan: Plutarch’s life of Lycurgus.
Coupal, Y. (2003). Macroeconomics of populism in Venezuela. Mimeo, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Freeman, S. (2003). The Cambridge companion to Rawls. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Gyurkocza, D. (2011). Political theory of populism. South – East Europe.
Laothamatas, A. (2006). Thaksina-Popular: Meanings, Problems and Solutions. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
Leeatham, P. (2015). The Reform of the Fiscal System and Government Budget to the Financial Discipline. .Journal of Economics, 19(1), 3-25.
MangKhalachon, N. (2010). News Agenda and Content Direction of Populist Policy as Presented in Newspaper During and Post Thaksin Shinawatra. Journal of Management Science Chiangrai Rajabhat University, 5(2), 64-96.
Mantasoot, P. (2015). Effectiveness of the Introduction of Civil Policy in Thai Rural Society. SSRU Graduate Studies Journal, 8(2), 298-308.
Muller, JWr. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia. PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, Kindle edition.
Pipatseritham N. (2008). Factors Affecting the Occurrence of Popular Nations in Thailand. Thammasat Economic Journal, 26(3), 119-166.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Revised Edition. US: Harvard University Press.
Saengkaew, A. (2016). The Concept and the Increasing of Public Debt Through Populist Policies Utilization. Political Science and Public Administration Journal Khon Kaen University, 1(2), 99-103.
Sarovat, S. (2013). The Populist Policies Used in the 2011 General Election Campaign: A Case Study of the Democrat Party and Pheu Thai Party. Ph.D. Dissertation. Krirk University.
Siripongtugsin, N. (2018). Restorative Justice: Managing Conflicts to Empower the Justice of Pru Khuan Kreng Community in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. Journal of Social Development, 20(1), 1-16.
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham. UK: Open University Press.
Techapeera, K. (2007). From Thaksin to coup 19 September 2549: Thailand’s Democratic Crisis. Bangkok: 14 October Foundation.
Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contest concept: populism in the study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics.34 (1). International Relations Quarterly. V.2(1). (Spring 2011/1 Tavasz). Retrieved Jun 30, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidbahr1/2017/06/30/how-sparta-became-spartan-plutarchs-life-of-lycurgus/#56c9dfe62757.
Wonsurawattana, K. (2007). The United States Civil Movement. Quality of Life and Law Journal, 3(1), 5-21.