The Components of Administration Good Governance of Nakhonratchasima Municipality
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is assesses three objectives. Firstly, to study The components of administration good governance of nakhonratchasimacity municipalty. Secondly, to study the investigate the consistency of these components with empirical data. and Third, it investigated problems and provided guidelines for administration good governance of nakhonratchasimacity municipalty. by using Mixed Method creswell & clark (2011) by Explanatory Sequential Design Research for quantitative research. The instrument used for data collection was a questionnaire with a sample of 692 people. Statistical data analysis using survey component analysis (Exploratory Factor Analysis: EFA) and confirmatory component analysis (Confirmatory Factor Analysis: CFA), in the qualitative research, the major contributors (Key Informants) 25 people, to qualitative data analysis by Miles & Huberman (1994: 10-12) The results of the research The components of administration good governance of nakhonratchasimacity municipalty include nine factors of as follows: 1) Equity (λ = 0.90) 2)Transparency (λ =0.88) 3) Decentralization (λ =0.86) 4) Efficiency (λ =0.86) 5) Participation (λ = 0.83) 6) Accountability (λ =0.78) 7) Effectiveness (λ =0.72) 8) Rule of Law (λ =0.77) and 9) Responsiveness (λ =0.63) with a harmonic index with empirical data Statistical significance at level 0.01 (ค่า c2 = 465.75, df = 420, c2/df = 1.046, p-value = 0.19983, GFI = 0.99, AGFI = 0.98, SRMR = 0.011, RMSEA = 0.014 และ CN = 2173.16) and in accordance with the principles of accuracy and comprehensive usefulness possibility to use including the appropriateness of use in all issues.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Creswell & Clark. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. (2rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publication.
Krejcie & Morgan. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30 (3).
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. UNDP policy document, New York.
Cheema. G. Shabbir. (2005). “From Public Administration to Governance: The Paradigm Shift in the Link between Government and Citizens” A paper presented at the 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government towards Participatory and Transparent Governance. on 24-27 May 2005, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Victor Pestoff. (2010). New Public Governance, Co-production & Third Sctor Social Services. Institute of Civil Society Studies. Ersta Skondal University Collage. Stockholm, Sweden.
Loffler Elke. (2005). “Governance and Government: Networking with External Stakeholders” in Public Management and Governance. Tony Bovaird and Elke Loffler (eds.) London: Taylor & Francis Group.