The Effects of Human Resource Management Innovation, Organizational Agility, and Organizational Dynamic Capabilities on the Performance of Security Service Companies in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region

Authors

  • Thanantorn Rattanasitthipak Ph.D. Student, Innovation Management Program, College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Chompoo Saisama e-Sports Management Program, College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Bundit Pungnirund Innovation Management Program, College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Tanapol Kortana Innovation Management Program, College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Jongdee Limchuchua Innovation Management Program, College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Management Innovation, Human Resources, Organizational Agility, Dynamic Capabilities, Organizational Performance

Abstract

This study examined the structural relationships among management innovation, human resources, and organizational agility, and their effects on organizational dynamic capabilities and organizational performance among security service companies in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected from a sample of 300 administrative and operational personnel using a validated questionnaire. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesized relationships. The results showed that the model fit the empirical data well (χ² = 205.462, df = 77, χ²/df = 2.668, CFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.075). The three exogenous variables jointly explained 46% of the variance in dynamic capabilities (R² = 0.46) and, together with dynamic capabilities, explained 45% of the variance in organizational performance (R² = 0.45), which was operationalized through service efficiency, customer satisfaction, and competitiveness. Organizational agility had the largest total effect on organizational performance, whereas human resources had the strongest direct effect on dynamic capabilities. Dynamic capabilities acted as a significant mediator, translating organizational resources and management structures into sustained organizational performance. These findings suggest that security service companies should prioritize organizational agility and human capital development jointly rather than as separate initiatives.

 

References

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resource management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306293668

Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421969

Bitner, M. J., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2021). Service marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Bunraksa, N., & Tantrakul, T. (2023). Management innovation in security guard business. Journal of Social Science and Cultural, 7(12), 288–303. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSC/article/view/270233 [in Thai]

Dadelo, S. (2005). Analysis of factors determining the competence of guards. Ugdymas · Kūno Kultūra · Sportas, 5(59), 13–18.

Department of Business Development. (2024). Security business registration statistics in Bangkok and vicinity. Ministry of Commerce. [in Thai]

Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006

Efendi, A. (2023). Service management training approach model as a step to increase the professionalism of employees in the security task force. International Journal of Applied Finance and Business Studies, 11(3), 320–329. https://www.ijafibs.pelnus.ac.id

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 72–84.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Mongkonkansai, J., Parapan, P., Srinuan, M., Thepnoo, T., Khoklang, S., Yimthiang, S., Mahaboon, J., & Madardam, U. (2024). Predicting the work ability of security guards at a university in Nakhon Si Thammarat province, Thailand. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 30(2), 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2318952

Mordor Intelligence. (2025). Thailand IT and security market size & share analysis: Growth trends & forecasts (2025–2030). https://www.mordorintelligence.com

Najam, U., Burki, U., & Khalid, W. (2020). Does work–life balance moderate the relationship between career commitment and career success? Evidence from an emerging Asian economy. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040082

Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

Security Business Act, B.E. 2558 (2015). (2015, November 5). Royal Gazette, 132(104A), 1–24. [in Thai]

Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

TechInsight360. (2025). Thailand application security market opportunity and future growth dynamics: Q1 2025 update.

United States Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. (2023). Security officers and patrol services competency model (v.1.0). https://www.doleta.gov/

Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800205

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Rattanasitthipak, T., Saisama, C., Pungnirund, B., Kortana, T., & Limchuchua, J. (2026). The Effects of Human Resource Management Innovation, Organizational Agility, and Organizational Dynamic Capabilities on the Performance of Security Service Companies in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Journal of Nakhonratchasima college (Humanities and Social Sciences), 20(2), 307–324. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hsjournalnmc/article/view/296182

Issue

Section

Research Article