Sensitivity and specificity of the Thai version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) in Department of Urban Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Diabetes-related distress may increase the risks of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale-5 (PAID-5) and the Diabetes Distress Score (DDS) have been widely used as screening tools and have been translated into several languages including Thai. However, their information about the Thai version’s sensitivity and specificity is limited. Therefore, the objective of this research was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the PAID-5 and DDS Thai versions.
Design: Cross-sectional study, diagnostic test
Methods: A total of 100 patients with diabetes, who attended the primary care of Urban Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital between April,1 to August 31 2022 were enrolled. Participants were asked about their general characteristics and given PAID-5 and the DDS Thai Version. The Thai version of PAID-5 and DDS were tested for their sensitivity and specificity by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Thai version as a standard measurement.
Results: The sensitivity of the PAID-5 Thai version was 40% and the specificity was 86.3%. Meanwhile, the sensitivity of the DDS Thai version was 40% and the specificity was 93.7%. The PAID-5 and DDS Thai versions were not significantly different in sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusion: The Thai versions of the PAID-5 and the DDS have low sensitivity for use as a diabetes-related distress screening tool in primary care settings. However, they have high specificity for detecting diabetes-related distress which could be applied in highly suspicious patients.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content and information in articles published in the PCFM journal are solely the opinions and responsibilities of the authors. The journal's editorial board does not necessarily agree with or share any responsibility for them.
All articles, information, content, images, etc., published in the PCFM journal are the copyright of the PCFM journal. If any individual or organization wishes to reproduce, distribute, or use any part or the entirety of the content, they must obtain written permission from the PCFM journal beforehand.
References
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9th edn. Brussels; 2019.
วิชัย เอกพลการ, หทัยชนก พรรคเจริญ, กนิษฐา ไทยกล้า. รายงานการสำรวจสุขภาพประชาชนไทยโดยการตรวจร่างกาย ครั้งที่ 5 พ.ศ.2557 [Internet]. 2557 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 27 ก.ค. 2564]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: http://www.thaincd.com/document/file/info/non-communicable-disease/การสำรวจสุขภาพประชาชนไทย_ครั้งที่_5_NHES_5.pdf.
กองโรคไม่ติดต่อ กรมควบคุมโรค กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. จำนวนและอัตราป่วย/ตายปี 2559-2562 ต่อประชากรแสนคน (รวมทุกการวินิจฉัยโรค) จำแนกรายจังหวัด เขตบริการสุขภาพและภาพรวมประเทศ (รวมกรุงเทพมหานคร) [Internet]. 2562 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 27 ก.ค. 2564]. เข้าถึงได้จาก http://www.thaincd.com/2016/mission/documents-detail.php?id=13893&tid=32&gid=1-020
สุรเกียรติ อาชานานุภาพ, วัลลา ตันตโยทัย, สุพัตรา ศรีวณิชชากร, ณภากุล โรจนสุภัค, ทัศนีย์ ญาณะ, บรรณาธิการ. คู่มือหน่วยบริการปฐมภูมิ:การจัดการเบาหวานแบบบูรณาการ. สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนาสุขภาพชุมชน;2552.
Egede LE, Hernández-Tejada MA. Effect of comorbid depression on quality of life in adults with Type 2 diabetes. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2013;13(1):83–91.
Harris MD. Psychosocial aspects of diabetes with an emphasis on depression. Curr Diab Rep. 2003;3(1):49–55.
Maraldi C, Volpato S, Penninx BW, Yaffe K, Simonsick EM, Strotmeyer ES, et al. Diabetes Mellitus, Glycemic Control, and Incident Depressive Symptoms Among 70- to 79-Year-Old Persons. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(11):1137.
สมพร รุ่งเรืองกิจ, ยุพา ถาวรพิทักษ์, วราลักษณ์ กิตติวัฒน์ไพศาล. ความชุกและปัจจัยทำนายภาวะซึมเศร้าในผู้ป่วยเบาหวานชนิดที่ 2. วารสารสมาคมจิตแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย. 2014;59(3):287–298.
Cheng LJ, Wang W, Lim ST, Wu VX. Factors associated with glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(9–10):1433–1450.
Lin EH, Katon W, Von Korff M, Rutter C, Simon GE, Oliver M, et al. Relationship of Depression and Diabetes Self-Care, Medication Adherence, and Preventive Care. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2154–2160.
Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, de Groot M, Carney RM, Clouse RE. Depression and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):934-942.
Dunn SM, Smartt HH, Beeney LJ, Turtle JR. Measurement of emotional adjustment in diabetic patients: validity and reliability of ATT39. Diabetes Care. 1986;9(5):480–489.
Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE, Schwartz CE. Assessment of Diabetes-Related Distress. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(6):754–760.
Herschbach P, Duran G, Waadt S, Zettler A, C Amm, Marten-Mittag B. Psychometric properties of the Questionnaire on Stress in Patients with Diabetes--Revised (QSD-R). Health Psychol. 1997;16(2):171-174.
Gross CC, Scain SF, Scheffel R, Gross JL, Hutz CS. Brazilian version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (B-PAID): Validation and identification of individuals at high risk for emotional distress. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76(3):455–459.
Huang MF, Courtney M, Edwards H, McDowell JAN. Validation of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-C) scale. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(1):38–40.
Jannoo Z, Yap BW, Khan NM, Farcomeni A. Assessing Diabetes Distress Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Malaysia Using the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. Value Heal Reg Issues. 2019;18:159–164.
Beléndez M, Hernández-Mijares A, Marco J, Domínguez JR, Pomares FJ. Validation of the Spanish version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-SP) Scale. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106(3):e93–e95.
Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626–631.
Thanakwang K, Thinganjana W, Konggumnerd R. Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Diabetes Distress Scale in diabetic seniors. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1353-1361.
McGuire BE, Morrison TG, Hermanns N, Skovlund S, Eldrup E, Gagliardino J, et al. Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1. Diabetologia. 2010;53(1):66–69.
Perrin NE, Davies MJ, Robertson N, Snoek FJ, Khunti K. The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine. 2017;34(11):1508–1520.
ธนา นิลชัยโกวิทย์, มาโนช หล่อตระกูล, อุมาภรณ์ ไพศาลสุทธิเดช. การพัฒนาแบบสอบถาม Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ฉบับภาษาไทยในผู้ป่วยโรคมะเร็ง. วารสารสมาคมจิตแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย. 1996;41(1):18-30.
Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2015;84(3):167–176.
