THE STUDY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIQUID DEMOCRACY AND LESSONS FROM ABROAD
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) Study the origins, meaning, and development of Liquid Democracy and 2) Propose guidelines for developing political participation through digital technology from international experiences. Employing documentary research methodology with a thematic analysis framework by using academic articles and books related to classical democracy, modern democracy, and the concept of liquid democracy. The theoretical findings indicate that Liquid Democracy originated from an idea proposed by an online user named Sayke, who suggested utilizing digital technology for voting and decision-making processes. Subsequently, this concept was adopted by various political movements and the Pirate Parties. They developed platforms to enable party members to participate in all aspects of online politics. Party members could exercise political power directly, featuring a sophisticated voting system that allowed for "Proxy" and recall of votes. The practical findings indicate that Thai political parties should restructuring organization to reduce bureaucratic characteristics; developing platforms that maximize member participation opportunities; refraining from controlling or interfering with members' expressions of opinion; establishing mechanisms to prevent some factions from making decisions on behalf of majority; proposing contemporary and distinct issues from other political parties; and, most importantly, ensuring political engagement is not confined solely to the online world. Party leaders and members must also interact with citizens in the real world.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
จำเนียร จวงตระกูล และคณะ. (2567). การวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลการวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพแบบการวิเคราะห์แก่นสาร: แนวทางปฏิบัติสำหรับนักวิจัยใหม่. วารสารสมาคมรัฐประศาสนศาสตร์แห่งประเทศไทย, 6(2), 15-29.
สุภางค์ จันทวานิช. (2563). การวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
Berinsky, Adam, J. et al. (2021). Tracking Truth with Liquid Democracy. Management Science, 36-78. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02470
Blum, C. & Zuber, C. (2016). Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(2), 162-182.
Congge, U. et al. (2023). Digital Democracy: A systematic Literature review. Retrieved April 15, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/GgNxo
Felice, M. (2022). Digital Citizenship: The Crisis of the Western Idea of Democracy and Participation on Digital Network. Italy: Mimesis International.
Gooding, Robert, E. (2008). Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hagberg, L. & Kazen, S. (2024). Predictive Liquid Democracy. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377557844_Predictive_Liquid_Democracy
Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heywood, A. (2013). Politics. (4th ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hofmann, J. (2018). The Promise and Pitfalls of Liquid Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(1), 3-23.
Kean, J. (2022). The Shortest History of Democracy. United Kingdom: Paragraph Publishing House.
Revel, M. et al. (2022). Liquid Democracy: An Empirical analysis of its epistemic performance. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://daniel-halpern.com/files/liquid-in-practice.pdf
Sumption, J. (2025). The Challenges of Democracy and The Rule of Law. United Kingdom: Profile Books.
Urbanati, N. (2008). Representative Democracy: Principles & Genealogy. United States of America: University of Chicago Press.
Valsangiacomo, C. (2021). Clarifying and Defining the Concept of Liquid Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review (SPSR), 28(1), 61-80.
Wright, S. (2012). The future of political participation: E-democracy and beyond. United Kingdom: Routledge.