DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL BASED ON COGNITIVE COACHING APPROACH AND COMMUNITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY APPROACH TO PROMOTE REFLECTIVE THINKING OF STUDENT TEACHERS

Main Article Content

Nilubon Katkaew

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) Develop and evaluate the quality of a learning management model based on the Cognitive Coaching Approach combined with the Community of Philosophical Inquiry Approach, and 2) Study the effectiveness of the developed learning management model by comparing and studying the level of reflective thinking ability. The target group was educational experts and pre-service teachers. The research instruments included a model component consistency assessment form and a reflective thinking ability test. The research was conducted using a research and development process. Data were analyzed using a summary of key points and descriptive statistics, including percentages, means, and standard deviations. Inferential statistics were used to test hypotheses with the Friedman and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests for pairwise differences. The research results revealed that 1) The developed learning management model had complete components, with four main teaching steps: reviewing prior beliefs, searching for new approaches, presenting findings, reviewing practices, and defining conditions for model implementation. The experts assessed the model quality consistency index at a range of 0.83 - 1.00, evaluating the model's suitability at the highest level. 2) The learning management model's effectiveness revealed that pre-test teachers' reflective thinking ability increased continuously with statistical significance from before, during, and after the test. Furthermore, a comparison of competency levels revealed that pre-test teachers were at the lecturing level, during the technical level, and after the test, demonstrating continuous development of pre-test teachers and demonstrating that the developed learning management model was clearly statistically effective. Furthermore, a comparison of competency levels revealed that pre-test teachers were at the lecturing level, during the technical level, and after the test, demonstrating continuous development of pre-test teachers and demonstrating that the developed learning management model was clearly statistically effective.

Article Details

How to Cite
Katkaew, N. . (2025). DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL BASED ON COGNITIVE COACHING APPROACH AND COMMUNITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY APPROACH TO PROMOTE REFLECTIVE THINKING OF STUDENT TEACHERS. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 12(9), 93–103. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/292756
Section
Research Articles

References

บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2554). การวิจัยเบื้องต้น. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 9). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สุวีริยาสาส์น.

Alsaleh, N. (2020). The Effectiveness of an Instructional Design Training Program to Enhance Teachers' Perceived Skills in Solving Educational Problems. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(12), 751-763.

Attard, K. & Armour, K. M. (2005). Learning to become a learning professional: Reflections on one year of teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 195-207.

Brooks, G. R. (2000). Cognitive coaching for master teachers and its effect on student teachers' ability to reflect on practice. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 67(1), 46-50.

Carr, J. F. & Herman, N. (2005). Creating dynamic schools through mentoring, coaching, and collaboration. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/OgRbV

Costa, A. L. & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Daniel, M. F. et al. (2017). Philosophy for children and the incidence of teachers’ questions on the mobilization of dialogical critical thinking in pupils. Creative Education, 8(06), 870-892.

Demissie, F. (2015). Promoting student teachers' reflective thinking through a philosophical community of enquiry approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(12), 1-13.

Faryadi, Q. (2012). Effective teaching and effective learning: instructional design perspective. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(1), 222-228.

Göker, S. D. (2020). Cognitive coaching: a powerful supervisory tool to increase teacher sense of efficacy and shape teacher identity. Teacher Development, 24(4), 559-582.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8(3), 381-391.

Harvey, M. et al. (2025). Reflecting on reflective practice: issues, possibilities and guidance principles. Higher Education Research & Development, 44, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2463517

Kennedy, D. (2004). The role of a facilitator in a community of philosophical inquiry. Metaphilosophy, 35(5), 744-765.

Ketsing, J. et al. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ reflective quality on inquiry-based teaching through a community of practice. Science Education International, 31(4), 367-378.

Khalil, M. K. & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in physiology education, 40(2), 147-156.

Lipman, M. et al. (2010). Philosophy in the classroom. New Jersey: Temple University Press.

Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of teacher education, 53(1), 33-43.

Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design and learning theory. Retrieved August 30, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/p1jNf

Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Routledge.

Straková, Z. & Cimermanová, I. (2018). Critical thinking development-A necessary step in higher education transformation towards sustainability. Sustainability, 10(10), 3366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103366

Zeichner, K. & Liston, D. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 23-49.