Analysis of the Multiple Choice Questions exam in the course of health and disease of newborns to adolescents 1 for 4th year medical students, faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University

Authors

  • Patarawadee Yodburee Department of Health Science Education, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000
  • Apirath Wangteeraprasert Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000
  • Jiranun Weerakul Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Public Health, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000
  • Orawan Keeratisiroj Bachelor of Science Program in Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000

Keywords:

Analysis of the exam, MCQs exam, Medical students

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are widely used in knowledge assessments because they can evaluate multiple objectives through numerous items. Following each exam, a test analysis is conducted to determine the validity and reliability of these questions. This study assessed the quality of MCQs used in the "Health and Diseases in Newborns to Adolescents I" course for fourth-year medical students of the Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University. The evaluation included analyzing individual question quality and overall test set effectiveness and examining the relationship between question difficulty levels before and after the exam.

Methodology: The study was retrospective data from medical student exams in the 2020 academic year. There were four sets of 100 questions. Sets 1-4 were tested with 65, 50, 49, and 13 students. All MCQ test sets have been reviewed and assessed for quality by an examination validity assessment committee to ensure it according to the purpose of the course. The 400 answers to questions were analyzed as a difficulty (p) and distributing (r) of the exam. Statistical tools were applied to examine relationships, including mean, standard deviation, KR-20 reliability coefficient, and Pearson correlation.

Results: The results showed that the item difficulty for all four test sets ranged from 0.20 to 0.80, with 65.75% of items falling within this range, and item discrimination values above 0.35 for 22.75% of items, indicating good discrimination power. The validity of the test sets was confirmed, as they aligned with the course objectives, content, and structure. Reliability coefficients for all four sets were found to be acceptable (≥0.70). The correlation between the difficulty levels of questions before and after the exam ranged from 0.31 to 0.50, suggesting consistency between pre- and post-exam difficulty levels.

Conclusion: This study analyzed the quality of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in the Health and Diseases in Newborns to Adolescents I for 4th year medical students. The findings indicate that most questions had appropriate difficulty and discrimination indices, with validity and reliability at acceptable levels. There was a moderate correlation between pre- and post-exam difficulty levels.

References

มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง. การวิเคราะห์ข้อสอบ. สืบค้น 21 พฤษภาคม 2567, จาก http://old-book.ru.ac.th/e-book/m/MR311/mr311-10.pdf.

จรอ ประดับศรี. (2550). คุณภาพของแบบทดสอบที่มีรูปแบบตัวเลือกและวิธีวิเคราะห์ต่างกัน. (วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต). สงขลา: มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏสงขลา.

จักรพงษ์ แผ่นทอง. (2564). การหาอำนาจจำแนกแบบทดสอบด้วยเทคนิค ร้อยละ 27 หรือวิธีของจุง เตห์ ฟาน (Chung-Teh Fan). สืบค้น 3 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568, จาก https://krujakkrapong.com.

เชิดศักดิ์ ไอรมณีรัตน์. (2552). การวิเคราะห์ข้อสอบปรนัย ภาควิชาศัลยศาสตร์ คณะแพทยศาสตร์ ศิริราชพยาบาลมหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล, เวชบันทึกศิริราช, 2(1), 31-37.

ธนภรณ์ แดงใจ, ปณิธี พูนเพชรรัตน์, จิรวดี ชุมพล, ทิชากรช์ อาทิตวรากูล. (2561). ความสอดคล้องของค่า Acceptability Index กับผลการสอบ MCQ ของนักศึกษาแพทย์ชั้นปีที่ 5 รายวิชาเวชศาสตร์ปฐมภูมิ 2 คณะแพทยศาสตร์ โรงพยาบาลรามาธิบดี มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล. รามาธิบดีเวชสาร, 41(1), 1-8.

ล้วน สายยศ และอังคนา สายยศ. (2543). เทคนิคการวัดผลการเรียนรู้ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2). กรุงเทพฯ: สุวีริยาสาส์น.

Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ, 37(9), 830-837. from https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.

Downing, S. M. (2004). Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ, 38(9), 1006-1012. from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01932.x.

Kaewpila, P., Chau-In, W., Limratana, N., & Panthongviriyakul, C. (2006). Post-test analysis of the comprehensive examination of Thailand Medical School Consortium for the 2005 KKU sixth-year students. Srinagarind Medical Journal, 21(3), 200-206.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19

How to Cite

Yodburee, P. ., Wangteeraprasert, A., Weerakul, J., & Keeratisiroj, O. (2025). Analysis of the Multiple Choice Questions exam in the course of health and disease of newborns to adolescents 1 for 4th year medical students, faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University. Trends of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 13(1), 220–231. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Humanties-up/article/view/283876

Issue

Section

Research Article