Qualitative Evaluation for Basic Badminton Skills in University Students

Main Article Content

Nopporn Tasnaina
Yurasin Wattanapayungkul
Parnisara Tasnaina

Abstract

This research and development project aimed to develop a qualitative assessment tool for basic badminton skills. A mixed-methods approach was used, including literature review, video analysis, field observation, expert interviews, focus group discussions, and field testing. The sample group consisted of 9 qualified experts who provided information for interviews to establish the framework and methodology for assessing fundamental badminton skills, 7 badminton experts who evaluated the quality of the assessment tool, 3 and 9 students in the small-group tryout, 32 students in the large-group tryout, totaling 44 students, and 140 students in the field testing group from 4 universities.


         The research results indicated that the developed assessment tool possessed a validity score of 0.97, reliability of 0.92, objectivity of 0.95, difficulty index of 0.62, and discrimination index of 0.46. The scoring criteria for the total quality of the 14 fundamental badminton skills (total 70, average 38.49,and  standard deviation 11.92) were established as follows: F = ≤ 20.72  points, D = 20.73 - 26.62 points, D+ =  26.63 - 32.52  points, C = 32.53 – 38.48  points, C+ = 38.49 - 44.46 points, B =  44.47 - 50.37  points, B+ =  50.38 - 56.38 points, and A = ≥ 56.39 points. Experts confirmed that the instrument is appropriate and can be effectively and practically used to qualitatively assess fundamental badminton skills in students at both school and university levels. Adaptation of the criteria should be considered for use with other groups of participants.


          Conclusion: The developed qualitative assessment tool was accepted as good test criteria and was suitable for use in evaluation of basic badminton skills of university students   It can also be adapted for the athletes and other groups by adjusting the criteria

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

ณัฐวุฒิ สิทธิชัย. (2556). การพัฒนามาตรฐานวิชาชีพของผู้ฝึกสอนกีฬาแบดมินตัน. วารสารวิชาการมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏภูเก็ต, 12(2), 163–192.

นภพร ทัศนัยนา, และคณะ. (2559). คู่มือผู้ฝึกสอนกีฬาแบดมินตัน. กรุงเทพฯ: กรมพลศึกษา กระทรวงการท่องเที่ยวและกีฬา.

นภพร ทัศนัยนา, และวีระพงศ์ บางท่าไม้. (2562). แบบทดสอบทักษะป้อนลูกและเกณฑ์ประเมินสำหรับผู้ฝึกสอนกีฬาแบดมินตัน. วารสารสุขศึกษา พลศึกษา และสันทนาการ, 45(2), 208–220.

Aryapradana, C. A., Cahyono, D., & Buhari, M. R. (2023). Analysis of smash forehand badminton strutting at the age of 9–14 years at Gemilang Badminton Club Samarinda. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 2(4), 1180–1185. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i4.349

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education,

, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022

Muhammad, A., Lebar, O., & Mokshein, S. E. (2018). Rubrics as assessment, evaluation and scoring tools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 1417–1431.

Phomsoupha, M., & Laffaye, G. (2014). The science of badminton: Game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Medicine, 45(4), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2

UNESCO. (2015). International charter of physical education, physical activity and sport. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235409