Guidelines for Strengthening Collaboration Networks and Promoting Sustainable Waste Management: A Case Study of the Na Phan Sam Subdistrict Administrative Organization, Mueang District, Phetchaburi Province

Sanchai  Ratthanakwan; Marndarath  Suksanga; Marco  Brunazzo

Authors

Sanchai Ratthanakwan College of Politics and Government, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Marndarath Suksanga College of Politics and Government, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
Marco Brunazzo Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, 38122 Italy

Keywords:

Collaboration network, Local administrative organization, Strengthening collaboration networks

Abstract

This study aimed to identify strategies for developing a high-performing local administrative organization by strengthening collaborative networks and synthesizing best practices from successful organizations. A qualitative research approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews with 20 key informants selected through purposive sampling, complemented by an extensive review of relevant documents and academic literature. The findings revealed that collaborative networks were initially established through informal “Coffee Council” meetings, which brought together representatives from government agencies and local communities to promote inclusive dialogue and collaborative problem-solving. The collaboration process emphasized establishing shared goals, fostering openness, and encouraging the exchange of ideas. Key success factors included a strong commitment to continuous learning and organizational development, effective teamwork, and sustained efforts to promote community development. The findings also suggest that other local administrative organizations can enhance their performance by adopting a horizontal management approach that promotes equitable participation in decision-making and supports participatory and transparent governance. Furthermore, establishing partnerships with educational institutions to facilitate knowledge sharing, promoting shared public values throughout the organization, and leveraging well-developed information and communication technology infrastructure were identified as critical factors contributing to organizational success.

References

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brillantes, A. B., & Cuachon, N. G. (2002). Decentralization and good governance in the Philippines: The Naga City model. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 46(1), 1–15.

Cain, B., Gerber, E. R., & Hui, I. S. (2020). The challenge of externally generated collaborative governance: California’s attempt at regional water management. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(4–5), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020908578

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Cui, C., & Yi, H. (2020). What drives the performance of collaboration networks: A qualitative comparative analysis of local water governance in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061819

Dean, R. (2018). Counter-governance: Citizen participation beyond collaboration. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1221

Douglas, S., Ansell, C., Parker, C. F., Sørensen, E., Hart, P. T., & Torfing, J. (2020). Understanding collaboration: Introducing the collaborative governance case databank. Policy and Society, 39(4), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1794425

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Faguet, J. P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.

Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research: Controversies and contexts. SAGE.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Huang, C., Yi, H., Chen, T., Xu, X., & Chen, S. (2020). Networked environmental governance: Formal and informal collaborative networks in local China. Policy Studies, 43(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1758306

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE.

Krogh, A. (2020). Facilitating collaboration in publicly mandated governance networks. Public Management Review, 24(5), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1862288

Liamputtong, P. (2008). Doing cross-cultural research: Ethical and methodological perspectives. Springer.

McIvor, D. W. (2019). Toward a critical theory of collaborative governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(4), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1678353

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x

Osborne, S. (2010). The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Routledge.

O'Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/976691

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Paulsson, A., Isaksson, K., Sørensen, C. H., Hrelja, R., Rye, T., & Scholten, C. (2018). Collaboration in public transport planning—Why, how and what? Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.013

Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. Harper & Row.

Resnik, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis

Roengtam, S., & Agustiyara, A. (2022). Collaborative governance for forest land use policy implementation and development. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2073670. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2073670

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114550439

Steytler, N. (2005). The place and role of local government in federal systems. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Titik, D. (2018). Collaborative governance as a management innovation in local decentralization. E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 09012. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187309012

Tuurnas, S., Stenvall, J., Virtanen, P. J., Pekkola, E., & Kurkela, K. (2019). Towards collaborative development culture in local government organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(6), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2018-0119

Wachhaus, A. (2021). Assessing collaboration in local healthcare networks. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(6), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2001007

Xing, P., & Xing, H. (2022). Blood is thicker than water: Local favouritism and inter-local collaborative governance. Policy Studies, 44(6), 748–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2022.2162033