การศึกษารัฐวิสาหกิจไทยด้วยหน่วยทางธุรกิจภายใต้ข้อเสนอของนักเศรษฐศาสตร์องค์การ

ผู้แต่ง

  • Pattarapong Salakshna คณะรัฐศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย

คำสำคัญ:

ทฤษฎีเศรษฐศาสตร์องค์การ, ทฤษฎีหน่วยทางธุรกิจ ต้นทุนธุรกรรมการดำเนินงาน, ตัวการตัวแทน, รัฐวิสาหกิจไทย

บทคัดย่อ

          การศึกษาองค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยในอดีตโดยมากมักเป็นการศึกษาผ่านกรอบแนวคิดและกระบวนทัศน์ของระบบราชการและระบบขนาดใหญ่ ซึ่งได้รับอิทธิพลและแนวคิดจากทฤษฎีระบบ (System Theory) เป็นสำคัญ จึงส่งผลให้รัฐวิสาหกิจไทยถูกวัดประสิทธิภาพและประสิทธิผลจากการดำเนินงานและผลประกอบการแต่เพียงมิติเดียว จนนำไปสู่วาทกรรมที่กล่าวถึงรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยว่าเป็นองค์การขนาดใหญ่แต่ไร้ศักยภาพ ขาดความคล่องตัว เพราะฉะนั้น บทความฉบับนี้จึงมุ่งศึกษารัฐวิสาหกิจไทยในยุคปัจจุบันผ่านมุมมองของนักเศรษฐศาสตร์องค์การ ซึ่งประกอบไปด้วยทฤษฎีหน่วยทางธุรกิจ (Theory of The Firm) ต้นทุนธุรกรรมการดำเนินงาน (Transaction Cost) และต้นทุนตัวการตัวแทน (Agency Cost) เพื่ออธิบายถึงรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยในฐานะหน่วยทางธุรกิจ ที่มีความสามารถในการดำเนินธุรกรรมและประสานผลประโยชน์ระหว่างตัวการตัวแทน อันจะนำไปสู่การสร้างกำไรจากผลประกอบการ หรืออย่างน้อยที่สุดก็ต้องไม่ประสบกับภาวะขาดทุน จนต้องพึ่งพาการอุดหนุนและงบประมาณจากภาครัฐ รวมไปถึงการมีจริยธรรมในทางเศรษฐศาสตร์ ซึ่งจะส่งผลให้เกิดธรรมาภิบาลขึ้นในทุกภาคส่วน ทั้งภายนอกและภายในองค์การ

เอกสารอ้างอิง

ADB. (2017). 20 Years After the Asian Financial Crisis: Lessons, Challenges, and the Way Forward. [Online] https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/363326/20-years-asian-financial-crisis.pdf.

Alchian, A. A. (1965). “THE BASIS OF SOME RECENT ADVANCES IN THE THEORY OF MANAGEMENT OF THE FIRM”.
Journal of Industrial Economics, 14 (1), 30. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?

url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5711597&site=ehost-live&scope=site. doi:10.2307/2097649

Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”. American Economic Review, 62 (5), 777-795. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?
url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4503851&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

André, R. (2010). “Assessing the Accountability of Government-Sponsored Enterprises and Quangos”. Journal of Business Ethics, 97 (2), 271-289. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/40929409.

Argyres, N. S., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). “Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries”. Organization Science, 23 (6), 1643-1657. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/23362018.

ASEANToday. (2017). Singapore’s Government-Linked Companies need to face up to disruption. [Online] https://www.aseantoday.com/2017/11/singapores-government-linked-companies-need-to-face-up-to-disruptioninstead-of-always-relying-on-possible-privileges-and-support-from-temasek-holdings-government-linked-companies-should-face/.

Bortolotti, B., & Faccio, M. (2009). “Government Control of Privatized Firms”. The Review of Financial Studies, 22 (8), 2907-2939. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/40247651.

Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2014). “State-owned Enterprises Around the WORLD as Hybrid Organizations”. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29 (1), 92-114. [Online] https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0069. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0069

Coase, R. H. (1937). “The Nature of the Firm”. Economica, 4 (16), 386-405. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626876. doi:10.2307/2626876

Coase, R. H. (1988a). “The Nature of the Firm: Influence”. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4 (1), 33-47. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/765013.

Coase, R. H. (1988b). “The Nature of the Firm: Meaning”. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4 (1), 19-32. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/765012.

Coase, R. H. (1988c). “The Nature of the Firm: Origin”. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4 (1), 3-17. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/765011.

Corporate Governance in Thailand. (2005). (S. Montreevat Ed.) : ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Inkpen, A., Musacchio, A., & Ramaswamy, K. (2014). “Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies”. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8), 919-942. [Online] https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.43. doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.43

Demortain, D., Arrellano-Gault, D., Rouillard, C., & Thoenig, J.-C. (2018). Bringing Public Organization and Organizing Back In. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.3B8A14B3&site=eds-live. doi:10.1177/0170840612473538

Demsetz, H. (1988). “The Theory of the Firm Revisited”. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4 (1), 141-161. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/765018.

Demyanyk, Y., & Van Hemert, O. (2011). “Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis”. The Review of Financial Studies, 24 (6), 1848-1880. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/20869292.

Dewenter, K. L., & Malatesta : H. (1997). “Public Offerings of State-Owned and Privately-Owned Enterprises: An International Comparison”. The Journal of Finance, 52 (4), 1659-1679. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/2329451. doi:10.2307/2329451

Dewenter, K. L., & Malatesta : H. (2001). “State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity”. The American Economic Review, 91 (1), 320-334. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/2677913.

Dickey, L., & Smith, A. (1993). Economics & Ethics in Smith's Theory of Capital Accumulation. In (pp. 213-220).
Eugene, F. F., & Michael, C. J. (1983). “Separation of Ownership and Control”. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26 (2), 301. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.725104&site=eds-live.

Goldeng, E., Grünfeld, L. A., & Benito, G. R. G. (2008). “The Performance Differential between Private and State Owned Enterprises: The Roles of Ownership, Management and Market Structure”. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (7), 1244-1273. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=34400136&site=ehost-live&scope=site. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00790.x

Grandori, A. (2013). Handbook of Economic Organization : Integrating Economic and Organization Theory. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gupta, N. (2005). “Partial Privatization and Firm Performance”. The Journal of Finance, 60 (2), 987-1015. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694774.

Hart, O. (1989). “An Economist's Perspective on the Theory of the Firm”. Columbia Law Review, 89 (7), 1757-1774. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/1122818. doi:10.2307/1122818

Huang, Y., & Dean-Leung, S. (2015). State-owned enterprise reform. Australia, Australia/Oceania: Asia Pacific Press.
International Finance Corporation, W. B. G. (2018). Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. [Online]
https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/c1b07feb-a7cd-4688-b93a-9585c7be38b8/SOE_Fact_Sheet_July2018.pdf?MOD=AJPERES

Jiang, Y., & Peng, M. W. (2011). “Principal-principal conflicts during crisis”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28 (4), 683-695. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-78751574956&site=eds-live. doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9186-8
Jones, B. D. (1999). “BOUNDED RATIONALITY”. Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1), 297. [Online]
http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=a9h&AN=5366755&site=ehost-live&scope=site. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.297

Kirsten, F., Nicolai, J. F., & Peter, G. K. (2006). An Entrepreneurial Theory of Economic Organization. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.289DC6C9&site=eds-live.
Leeahtam : (2016). Sustainability of the World/Thai Economy and Fiscal Integrity. [Online]
http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.EB16B4FB&site=eds-live.

Lin, J. Y., Cai, F., & Li, Z. (1998). “Competition, Policy Burdens, and State-Owned Enterprise Reform”. The American Economic Review, 88 (2), 422-427. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/116960.

Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization”. Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2), 321-389. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/2698243.

Michael, C. J., & William, H. M. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.608A4D5A&site=eds-live.

Musolf, L. (1989). “Accountability and Government-Sponsored Enterprises”. Public Administration Review, 49 (6), 584-584. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/976590. doi:10.2307/976590

Musolf, L. (1991). “Government-Sponsored Enterprises and Congress”. Public Administration Review, 51 (2), 131-137. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/977106. doi:10.2307/977106

Nandini, G. (2001). Partial Privatization and Firm Performance: Evidence from India. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.EC5635BE&site=eds-live.

Oliver, E. W. (1979). “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”. The Journal of Law & Economics, 22 (2), 233. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.725118&site=eds-live.

Oliver, E. W. (1991a). “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2), 269. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?
url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.2393356&site=eds-live. doi:10.2307/2393356

Oliver, E. W. (1991b). “Economic Institutions: Spontaneous and Intentional Governance”. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7, 159. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.764962&site=eds-live.

Oliver, E. W. (1993). “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization”. The Journal of Law & Economics, 36 (1), 453. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.725485&site=eds-live.


Oliver, E. W. (1998). “The Institutions of Governance”. The American Economic Review, 88 (2), 75. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.116896&site=eds-live.

Oliver, E. W. (1999). “Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective”. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15 (1), 306. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?
url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.3554953&site=eds-live.
Oliver, E. W. (2000). New Institutional Economics. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?
url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.5A1CC129&site=eds-live.
Oliver, E. W. (2002a). “The Lens of Contract: Private Ordering”. The American Economic Review, 92 (2), 438. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.3083447&site=eds-live.
Oliver, E. W. (2002b). “The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (3), 171. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?
url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.3216956&site=eds-live.
Oliver, E. W. (2010). “Transaction Cost Economics: The Natural Progression”. The American Economic Review, 100 (3), 673. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.27871227&site=eds-live.

Organisation for Economic, C.-o., & Development. (2011). Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises Change and Reform in OECD Countries since 2005. In. Belgium, Europe: OECD Publishing.

Pasuk, P., & Baker, C. (2016). Unequal Thailand : aspects of income, wealth and power. Singapore : NUS Press, 2016.
Peng, M. W., Bruton, G. D., Stan, C. V., & Huang, Y. (2016). “Theories of the (st
ate-owned) firm”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management (2), 293. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.452677251&site=eds-live. doi:10.1007/s10490-016-9462-3

Richard, N. L., & Nicolai, J. F. (1996). Capabilities and Governance: the Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.38147A0&site=eds-live.

Ronald, C. (1998). “The New Institutional Economics”. The American Economic Review, 88 (2), 72. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.116895&site=eds-live.

Rosser, E. M., & Sanders, D. M. (2017). Government-Sponsored Enterprises after 1968 Public-Private Ownership, Control, and Political Impacts. In A History of Mortgage Banking in the West (pp. 249-268) : University Press of Colorado.
Shapiro, S. P. (2005). “Agency Theory”. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 263-284. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/29737720.

Smith, A. (2014). The wealth of nations: Middletown. DE : Shine classic, 2014.

Song, L. (2018). State-owned enterprise reform in China Past, present and prospects. In L. Song, R. Garnaut, & C. Fang (Eds.), China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development (pp. 345-374) : ANU Press.

Stanton, T. H. (1991). “Increasing the Accountability of Government-Sponsored Enterprises: Next Steps. [Report of the Secretary of the Treasury on Government Sponsored Enterprises, Department of the Treasury; Government Sponsored Enterprises: A Framework for Limiting the Government's Exposure to Risks, U. S. General Accounting Office; Controlling the Risks of Government Sponsored Enterprises, Congressional Budget Office; Recommendation 91-6: Improving Supervision of the Safety and Soundness of Government Sponsored Enterprises, Administrative Conference of the United States]”. Public Administration Review, 51 (6), 572-575. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/976611. doi:10.2307/976611

Stanton, T. H. (2009). “Government-Sponsored Enterprises: Reality Catches up to Public Administration Theory”. Public Administration Review, 69 (4), 632-639. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/27697909.
State-Owned Enterprise Reform in Vietnam: Lessons from Asia. (1996). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Symposium In, O., Oliver, E. W., Professor Emeritus Of, B., & Hideshi, I. (2010). Defining the Agenda for the Next Decade of Research on Economic Governance. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.E3913172&site=eds-live.
The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World. (2000). (P. A. Toninelli Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1995). Hierarchies, Markets and Power in the Economy : An Economic Perspective. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.982E406&site=eds-live.

Zhang, C. M., & Greve, H. R. (2018). “Delayed Adoption of Rules: A Relational Theory of Firm Exposure and State Cooptation”. Journal of Management, 44 (8), 3336-3363. [Online] http://ezproxy.car.chula.ac.th/login?
url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=132161927&site=ehost-live&scope=site. doi:10.1177/0149206316673719

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2019-12-30

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Salakshna, P. (2019). การศึกษารัฐวิสาหกิจไทยด้วยหน่วยทางธุรกิจภายใต้ข้อเสนอของนักเศรษฐศาสตร์องค์การ. Journal for Developing the Social and Community, 6(2), 489–512. สืบค้น จาก https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdirmu/article/view/233213

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความวิชาการ