Model local regulations to protect the rights of folk philosopher

Abstract

Background and Aims: The research study on the prototype local ordinance to protect the rights and benefits of folk philosopher has the following objectives: 1) to study the concepts and principles related to the prototype local ordinance to protect the rights and benefits of folk philosopher 2) to study and compare laws, both foreign
and domestic, related to the prototype local ordinance to protect the rights and benefits of folk philosopher 3) to study and analyze problems in the formulation
of the prototype local ordinance to protect the rights and benefits of folk philosopher 4) to develop a prototype local ordinance to protect the rights and benefits of folk philosopher.

Methodology: This research is qualitative, using documentary research, including
a study of primary document data, including international environmental law, foreign law, and Thai law, as well as secondary documents, including textbooks, laws, research reports, journal articles, seminar documents, electronic media articles and books, etc.
In addition, field research will be conducted, including in-depth interviews with 15 people, focus group discussions with 25 people, and listening to opinions with 50 people, in order to develop a model local ordinance to protect the rights and benefits of local scholars.

Results: The research findings indicate that: 1) Local government organizations play an important role in promoting the concepts of folk philosopher and local wisdom, knowledge management, human rights, social and cultural capital, indigenous community rights, participation, decentralization, human dignity protection, and benefit-sharing rights management, in line with the roles and responsibilities of local government organizations in concrete local development. 2) International law, national law,
and domestic law play a role in promoting and protecting the rights of folk philosopher in various aspects, including community rights, decentralization, cultural conservation, and intellectual property protection. These are essential foundations for promoting local regulations to protect local wisdom sustainably and fairly. 3) The lack of integration of human rights and community rights concepts in the process of drafting local regulations addresses the lack of integration of the concepts of human rights and community rights in the process of drafting local regulations. The wisdom of folk philosopher should not simply be viewed as "cultural objects," but should also be recognized as "cultural rights," which knowledge owners have the right to protect, control, and transmit in their own ways. Establishing a model local ordinance to protect the rights and benefits of folk philosopher is a valuable effort to strengthen the sustainability of the cultural roots
of Thai society. However, structural problems persist. Both in terms of law, implementation mechanisms, participation systems and understanding of rights 4) The preparation of a model local ordinance to protect the rights of folk philosopher has regulations in the following areas: general section, committee for protecting the rights of folk philosopher, powers and duties of the committee for protecting the rights of Folk philosopher, procedures for protecting the rights of folk philosopher, rights of folk philosopher, powers and duties of local administrative organizations in protecting the rights of folk philosopher, penalties and appeals.

Conclusion: The development of model local ordinances to protect the rights of folk philosopher creates a platform for genuine public participation. Therefore, protecting the rights of folk philosopher is not solely the responsibility of any one individual, but rather a shared responsibility of the government, the public, and the community, to elevate local wisdom as a foundation for sustainable development in Thai society.