The super leadership behavior of school administrators Affecting the professional learning communiity of School under the secoundary educatioanl Service area offoce Nongkhai
Keywords:
Super Leadership Behavior, Professional Learning Community, The Secondary Educational Service Area Office NongkhaiAbstract
The purposes of this research were to 1) study the components and indicators of the super leadership behavior of school administrators, 2) study super leadership behavior of school administrators, 3) study the professional learning community of schools, 4) study the leadership between super leadership of school administrators and the professional learning community of schools, and 5) create a forecast of
the schools professional learning community under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai. In the research was conducted associated with 2 phases. The first phase was was to investigate the component of the super leadership behavior of school administrators. The best practice was studied out of 3 school administrators who were selected purposively for the in-depth interviewing. There were 5 experts verify the components. The instruments were unstructured interview form and component verified form. Content analysis and percentage were used in data analysis. The second phase was to study the super leadership behavior of school administrators. The samples were 285 teachers in the school under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai using stratified random sampling. The instrument was a 5 rating-scales questionnaire with the reliability of .987 and .986 respectively. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency distribution, percentage, mean and standard deviation, Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results of the research showed that 1) The components of the Super leadership behavior of school administrators had 5 components and 50 indicators. 2) The Super leadership behavior, school administrators under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, was at in the high level. 3) The Professional Learning Community of schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, was at in the high level. 4) The Super leadership of school administrators and the professional learning community of schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, they had a relationship. 5)
The forecasting equation for the professional learning community of schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, by using super leadership of school administrators as predictive variable 71.20 percent power, with the following equation. The forecasting equation in raw scores as follows equation of raw score: = .827+.379(X5)+.243(X1)+.174(X3). The equation of standard score:
= .452(X5)+.273(X1)+.188(X3)
The purposes of this research were to 1) study the components and indicators of the super leadership behavior of school administrators, 2) study super leadership behavior of school administrators, 3) study the professional learning community of schools, 4) study the leadership between super leadership of school administrators and the professional learning community of schools, and 5) create a forecast of
the schools professional learning community under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai. In the research was conducted associated with 2 phases. The first phase was was to investigate the component of the super leadership behavior of school administrators. The best practice was studied out of 3 school administrators who were selected purposively for the in-depth interviewing. There were 5 experts verify the components. The instruments were unstructured interview form and component verified form. Content analysis and percentage were used in data analysis. The second phase was to study the super leadership behavior of school administrators. The samples were 285 teachers in the school under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai using stratified random sampling. The instrument was a 5 rating-scales questionnaire with the reliability of .987 and .986 respectively. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency distribution, percentage, mean and standard deviation, Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results of the research showed that 1) The components of the Super leadership behavior of school administrators had 5 components and 50 indicators. 2) The Super leadership behavior, school administrators under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, was at in the high level. 3) The Professional Learning Community of schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, was at in the high level. 4) The Super leadership of school administrators and the professional learning community of schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, they had a relationship. 5)
The forecasting equation for the professional learning community of schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Nongkhai, by using super leadership of school administrators as predictive variable 71.20 percent power, with the following equation. The forecasting equation in raw scores as follows equation of raw score: = .827+.379(X5)+.243(X1)+.174(X3). The equation of standard score:
= .452(X5)+.273(X1)+.188(X3)
References
Chiangkul, W. (2008). State of Education in Thailand 2006/2007. Problem solving and solutions. Bangkok : VCT Communication.
Dechakumpoo, N. (2015). Leadership over leadership of school administrators. Under the jurisdiction of Roi Et Primary Educational Service Area Office, Region 1. Roi Et : Roi Et Parajabhat University.
Dimmock, C. & Walker, A. (2002). School Leadership and Administration: Adopting a Cultural Perspective. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Hord, S. M. (2004). Learning together, adding together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. (6th ed). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Khumpai, H. (2011). A study of the need for leadership development over leadership of school administrators. Under the Office of Chonburi Primary Educational Service Area. Chanthaburi : Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University.
Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P. Jr. (1991). The New SuperLeadership Leading Other to LeadThemselves. San Francisco: Berreit-Koehler.
Office of Teacher Development and Basic Education Personnel. (2017). Training manual for driving process PLC (Professional Learning Community) "Professional learning community" to educational institutions. Bangkok : Bureau of Teacher Development and Basic Education Personnel.
Panmanee, A. (2003). Creative Psychology of Teaching and Learning. Bangkok: Yaimai Creative Group.
Supavanich, K. (2017). Professional learning community. Lecture document on teacher development by using professional learning communities Prepared by the Office of Teacher Development and Basic Education Personnel. and the working group of the Minister of Education on April 30, 2017 at Cholapruek Resort Hotel, Nakhon Nayok Province.
Vescio, V., et al. (2006). Teaching and teacher education: A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (2008), 80-91.
Wongyai, W. (2019). Quality development of learning management according to the concept of professional learning community. Bangkok : Center for Innovation Leaders in Curriculum and Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 พิไลวรรณ สีประสม, พนายุทธ เชยบาล
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles that are published are copyrighted by the authors of the articles
