The development guideline Instructional leadership of school administrators in Roi- Et Municipality
Keywords:
Instructional leadership, School administratorsAbstract
The purposes of this research were to 1) study Instructional leadership of school administrators in Roi- Et Municipality 2) study the methods for developing the transformational leadership of school administrators. The research process was divided to 2 phases: Phase 1 to study Instructional leadership of school administrators in Roi- Et Municipality. The sample group used in the research was 136 school administrator and teachers. The instruments used in this research were the 5-level scale questionnaire with the power of discrimination 0.22 - 0.89 and confidence of the whole questionnaire .88 The statistics used for data analysis were mean, percentage, standard deviation. Phase 2 to study guideline Instructional leadership of school administrators in Roi- Et Municipality. The target group is 9 people. Tools for collecting interview information Data analysis by content analysis Is a structured equation. The research results were found that
- Instructional leadership of school administrators in Roi- Et Municipality in overall and in each aspect at a high level, by raking from maximum to minimum average following 1) Creating a conducive atmosphere and environment Learning 2) Curriculum and learning management 3) teacher development 4) Determination clear to vision mission and goals and 4) student quality development.
- guideline Instructional leadership of school administrators in Roi- Et Municipality include 1) focus on the differences and needs of the student2) reduction projects or activities into or integrate 3) supervising, monitoring and evaluating progress in the implementation of the vision. Mission and goals through participation 4) support teachers to conducting classroom research and 5) analyze the needs of parents, students, community and local communities to curriculum development.
References
Amos, C.T. (2018). An analysis of the correlation of leadership frames between superintendents and school board presidents in Texas public schools. Texas: Tarleton State University.
Bookbinder, R. (1992). The principle: leadership for the effective and productive school. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas publisher.
Chaijan, P. (2019). A strategy of educational management in 21st Century of schools under jurisdiction of local Administration organizatio. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat Vol.6 No.8 (October 2019).
Charoenchai, W. (2021). Development of a high-performance organization management model for improving the quality of education in educational institutions under the Provincial Administrative Organization. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 1 (1), 29-50.
Charoensuk, P. (2010). Development of academic indicators for basic education institutions. Master of Thesis: Khon Kaen University.
Chell, Jan. (1999). Introducing Principals to the Role of Instructional Leadership: A summary of a master’s project by Jan Chell. [Online]. http://www.ssta.sk.ca/research/leadership/95-14.htm. [August 2, 2020]
Choosup, S. (2007). Developing tools and indicators for effective educational institution administrators. Master of Thesis: Silpakorn University.
Department of Local Administration. (2018). School-based Management for Local Development – SBMLD. Bangkok: Department of Local Administration.
Dimmock, C., & A. Walker. (2005). Educational Leadership: Culture and Diversity. Gateshead: Athenaeum Press.
Glickman, C. D. (2007). Super vision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach. (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C. & Curphy, G. J. (2012). Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experiences. (7th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Juntong, P. (2016). Beyond the limit to the millennium of quality. Educational Quality Assessment Report of the Office for Accreditation and Quality Assessment (Public Organization). Bangkok: Offset Plus.
Ketvisetkul, T. (2021). “The Studying Issues of True Leadership”. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 1 (1), 51-66.
Khambud, S. (2016). Development of a model for enhancing academic leadership of basic education administrators Under the Office of Roi Et Primary Education Area 2. Master of Thesis: Roi Et Rajabhat University.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Krug, R.E. (1992). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
McEwan, E. K. (1998). Seven Steps to Effect Instructional Leadership. California: Corwin Press.
Ministry of Education. (2017). Academic Leadership Reinforcement. (3nded). Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
Office for Accreditation and Quality Assessment. (2016). Beyond the limit To the millennium of quality. Bangkok: Offset Plus.
Office of the Education Council. (2020 ). State of education in Thailand 2018/2019 educational reform in the digital era. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council.
Office of the Education Council. (2020). Council for Education Symposium 2019 (OEC Forum 2019): From Policy Recommendations to Educational Quality Improvement. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council.
Petchrot, L and Chamniprasart, A. (2002). Research methodology. Bangkok: pimdeekarnpim.
Phongsriwat, S. (2010). School Leaders and Orientation. [Online]. http://www. gotoknow.org/posts/385724. [ 15 March 2020]
Plarin, K. (2009) Development of instructional leadership indicators For basic education school principals. Khon Kaen University.
Pornrungroj, C. (2016). beyond the limit To the millennium of quality. Educational Quality Assessment Report of the Office for Accreditation and Quality Assessment (Public Organization). Bangkok: OFFSET PLUS CO.,LTD.
Runcharoen, T. (2010). Professionalism in organizing and administering education in the educational reform era. Khaofang.
Seesakote, J. (2017). Organizational Atmosphere Affecting Professional Learning Community of Teachers Under Khon Kaen Municipality. Master of. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University.
Srisaat, B. (2013). Preliminary research. (9nded). Bangkok: Suwiriyasan.
Thepkanjana, P. (2016). Beyond the limit to the millennium of quality. Educational Quality Assessment Report of the Office for Accreditation and Quality Assessment (Public Organization). Bangkok: Offset Plus.
Tirakanan, S. (2000). Project Assessment: A Guide to Action. Bangkok: Ramkhamhaeng University.
Tonapalin, C. (2019) Educational Institution Management Model for Developing the Quality of Early Childhood Students Under the Office of the Private Education Commission. Bangkok: North Bangkok University.
Wisalaporn, S. (2008). State of education in the southern border provinces. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council.
Wonganutrohd, P. (2010). Academic administration. Bangkok: Bangkok Supplemental Media Center.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Research and Development Institute Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles that are published are copyrighted by the authors of the articles
