QUESTION-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP: PRIME MINISTER AND JOURNALISTS

Authors

  • Hathaichanok Anghirun Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Phetchabun Rajabhat University
  • Jeerapan Phomprasert Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Phetchabun Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Question-Response Relationship, Prime Minister, Journalists

Abstract

This current quantitative research aimed at analyzing text cohesion through the prime minister (PM) corresponding answers given to the journalists’ query. In political discourse, the use of language plays a substantial role in determining the politicians’ perceptions. Regarding the study objective, verbal responses or speeches given by the PM and the journalists, took place in the five latest press conferences during March, were collected and transcribed. Cohesion principle proposed by Halliday and Hasan was employed to analyze the cohesion of texts embedded in the PM responses. A number of cohesive devices found were then computed and presented into percentages.

The research findings revealed that in all press conferences, the prime minister genuinely provided relative responses to the journalists’ questions, at least 25%. Analysis of speech cohesion also shows that the prime minister frequently employed reiteration, one of cohesive devices involving word repetition, in order to certify his ideologies as well as to gain trust from the public towards the different issues being questioned. The objective of this study was finally proved that verbal communication holds much weight, as for the politicians’ ideology expression or decisions and as for the public judgement. The results moreover suggest to less count sorts of demeanors and non-verbal languages of the politicians.

References

Bahaziq, A. (2016). Cohesive Devices in Written Discourse: A Discourse Analysis of a Student’s Essay Writing. English Language Teaching, 9(7), 112-199.

Briesmaster, M. & Etchegaray, P. (2017). Coherence and Cohesion in EFL Students’ Writing Production: The impact of a metacognition-based intervention. Medellín, Colombia, 22(2), 183-202.

Bull, P., & Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 4, 651-666.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysis Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Clayman, S. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society, 30(3), 403–442.

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2017). Coherence and persuasion in political speeches: Ideological coherence in coherent discourse. In Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse (pp. 129-153). Brno: Masaryk University.

Enyi, A. U. & Chitulu, M. O. (2015). Texture, Textuality and Political Discourse: A Study of Lexical Cohesion in Nigeria’s President Goodluck Jonathan’s Inaugural Address, May, 2011. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(5), 77-86.

Eriksson, G. (2011). Follow-up Questions in Political Press Conferences. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3331-3344.

Eshbaugh, M. (2012). The Politics of Presidential Press Conferences. American Politics Research, 41(3), 471–497.

Favart, M., Potocki, A., Broc, L., Quemart, P., Bernicot, J., & Olive, T. (2016). The management of cohesion in written narratives in students with specific language impairment: Differences between childhood and adolescence. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 59, 318-327.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hameed, T. H. (2008). Cohesion in Texts: A Discourse Analysis of a News Article in a Magazine. AL-Faith Journal, 37, 81-114.

Jabeen, I., Qasim, Z., & Nawaz, S. (2014). Cohsive Ties and Meaning Comprehension. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 2(4), 100-109.

Jalilifar, R. A. & Alavi, M. (2011). Power and Politics of Language Use: A Survey of Hedging Devices in Political Interviews. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(3), 44.

Karadeniz, A. (2017). Cohesion and Coherence in Written Texts of Students of Faculty of Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 93-99.

Klebanov, B. B., Diermeier, D., & Beigman, E. (2008). Lexical Cohesion Analysis of Political Speech. Political Analysis, 16, 447-463.

Kwon, Y. O. (2019). Social Trust and Economic Development. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Li, J. (2013). The Application and Significance of Discourse Cohesion and Analysis in Practical Teaching of Foreign Language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1393-1398.

Mandarani, V. & Fakhruddin, M. Z. (2020). Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion Analysis of Trump’s Speech Upon Soleimani Assassination. Journal of English Languages and Literature, 7(1), 131-139.

Pathomchaiwat, L. (2020). Discourse Analysis of the Political Speeches. In Proceedings of the 12th NPRU National Academic Conference (pp. 2098-2105). Nakhon Pathom: Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University.

Struthers, L., Lapadat, C. J., & MacMillan, D. P. (2013). Assessing cohesion in children’s writing: Development of a checklist. Assessing Writing, 18(3), 187-201.

Voltmer, K., & Brants, K. (2011A). Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics. Britain: Palgrave MacMillan.

Voltmer, K., & Brants, K. (2011B). A Question of Control: Journalists and Politicians in Political Broadcast Interviews. Britain: Palgrave MacMillan.

Wang, J. (2010). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s Speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254-261.

Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A Short Analysis of Discourse Coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460-465.

Ye, J., & Liu, X. (2020). Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence in Two Truths to Live By. Theory and Practice in La

Downloads

Published

2022-04-29

How to Cite

Anghirun, H., & Phomprasert, J. (2022). QUESTION-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP: PRIME MINISTER AND JOURNALISTS . Social Science Journal of Prachachuen Research Network, 4(1), 1–13. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/prn/article/view/254647

Issue

Section

Research Articles