A Model for the Development of Academic Leadership of Basic School Administrators in the Digital Age
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research paper aims to 1) to study the basics for building the academic leadership development model of the digital age basic education institution administrators. 2) Create a model for the development of academic leadership of the administrators in the digital age 3) to assess the academic leadership development model of the administrators in the digital age This was a blended research. The sample group was 380 school administrators. The research was divided into 3 phases: Phase I studied the basics for creating a pattern. Academic leadership development Of the primary school administrators phase 2, the creation of a model for the development of academic leadership of the administrators in the digital age. Phase 3 Evaluation of the Academic Leadership Development Model of the Administrators of Basic Educational Institutions The tools used were 1) a 5-level estimation scale questionnaire. 2) a semi-structured interview. The statistics used in the quantitative data analysis were mean and standard deviation. The qualitative data included content analysis, median, mode and interquartile range.
The research findings showed as follows: 1) The basic data on academic leadership behavior of school administrators showed that the leadership behavior of the administrators was at a moderate level, mean ( = 3.41, S.D. = 0.67). 2) The results of creating a model for academic leadership development consist of 2 main components, which are core components 1. Academic leadership has 6 areas: vision, digital leadership. Building a digital network for learning Human resource development Curriculum and technology learning management Modern technology communication and technology supervision, monitoring, measurement and evaluation. The second key component of academic leadership development has 3 aspects: Google For Education Line Facebook 3) The results of assessing the feasibility, feasibility and usefulness of the academic leadership development model of the digital foundation school administrators found that the overall picture was at a high level. ( = 4.08, S.D.=0.47 )
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Am Don Kloy, S. (2013). Role of school administrators in the century 21. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Graduate School, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 7(1), 1-8.
Anan Navee, P. (2009). Principles and concepts Educational Administration Theory. (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Montree.
Chamchoy, S. (2018). School management in the digital age. Bangkok: Pimpluck Chulalongkorn University Press.
chareonwongsak, K. (2008). Analyze the factors contributing to the increase in educational achievement.Education alarticles. Retrieved June 8, 2020, from http://oknation.nationtv.tv/blog/kriengsak.
Imlaiwan, A. & Chongwilaikasem, W. (2018) Using Facebook as a communication channel. Teach in communication science. Journal of Communication Arts, Master of Business, 7(2), 1-19.
Issararak, A. (2005). Relationship between leadership and school effectiveness. Secondary Education, Eastern Region. (Master's Thesis). Educational Administration, Burapha University. Bangkok.
Pandam, S. (2020). Turning the crisis into an opportunity for Thai vocational education on the new normal. Journal of Social Sciences and Anthropology Buddhist. 5(7), 1-13.
Pholdongnok, J. (2013). Development of an online training system for you at the technology user service provider Commercial bank. Academic journal. 6(1), 1-14.
Pow Phan, C. (2014). Concepts and fundamental theories of school administrators' leadership in21st. Century Journal of Educational Administration Khon Kaen University, 12(1),1-14.
Roon Charoen, T. (2012). Professionalism in educational organization and administration in the educational reform era. (7th ed.). Bangkok: LT Place Co., Ltd.
Sukthudyot, W. (2015). A model for the development of academic management competencies of the administrators. Educational institutions under the Primary Educational Service Area Office. (Doctoral Dissertation). Naresuan University. Phitsanulok.
Sunthornthanaphon, N. (2019). A study of students' satisfaction towards teaching and learning management.Via Google Class Room Course in Western music history. Institute of Culture and Arts Srinakharinwirot University, 21(1), 1-14.
Suwanatat, P. (2020). Epidemic causes inequality to learn online. May not answer Joat Because some children lack equipment. Retrieved May 9, 2020., from https://brandinside.asia/%E0%B9%89how-covid-19-transform-education-system/.
TDRI. (2013). New Development Model: Toward Quality Growth by Increasing Productivity. Retrieved May 9, from https://thaipublica.org/2013/11/tdri-year-end-4/
Thawuthit, C. (2015). Model for Academic Leadership Development School level Secondary Education. (Doctoral Dissertation). Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University. Sakon Nakhon.
Uchanapanya, N. (2020). Me, let's win Panya in 2020 when the virus in 2019 is changing. World education system. Retrieved May 9, 2020 from https://www.eef.or.th/30577/.
Wannasri, J. (2010). Academic leadership of school administrators. Journal of Education. Naresuan University, 12(1), 35-49.
Waston, S. H. (2000). The Leadership requirements in 21 century. The Perceptions of Canadian private secto leaders. n.p.
Wehachat, R. (2008). Development of quality management models for educational Institutions Basic. (Doctoral Dissertation). Burapha University. Chonburi.
