Designing for Connection: Development of a Weighted and Warmth Wrap for Reducing Loneliness in Young Adults
Main Article Content
Abstract
This design research aimed to develop a prototype device and design principles for reducing loneliness in young adults by leveraging an understanding of the embodied experience of loneliness. The study was conducted in the following phases: Phase 1, titled “Reducing Loneliness in Young Adults: Design Research of a Warming Weighted Blanket Prototype.” This phase represented Phase 2, a design research study conducted in Bangkok. The prototype was co-developed with design and manufacturing experts as well as a user group of 19 young adult males aged 22–30 years, who were recruited and selected for high levels of loneliness using the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. The study was executed through a three-step design research process: 1) exploration and analysis of Phase 1 data combined with relevant theories, such as embodied cognition, social thermoregulation, and body awareness, to establish preliminary design principles and a foresight map; 2) design and fabrication of the “warming weighted blanket” prototype along with alpha and beta evaluations; and 3) evaluation and reflection through gamma evaluation to synthesize the finalized design principles.
The research successfully developed the V1 blanket prototype, which provides a pressure of 2.27 kg and warmth to the upper torso. User evaluation revealed that the V1 prototype could stimulate body perception and a sense of self-connection, particularly through pressure, while generating temporary feelings of emotional comfort and relaxation. The definitive outcome is the STEAD design principles (Self-connection, Thermal Warmth, Ease of Use, Adaptive Modulation, Deep Pressure), providing a framework for creating innovations that address the physical dimensions of loneliness, leading to the theoretical proposition that “loneliness is an essential tool for self-construction.”
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Baas, L. S., Beery, T. A., Allen, G., Wizer, M., & Wagoner, L. E. (2004). An Exploratory Study of Body Awareness in Persons with Heart Failure Treated Medically or with Transplantation. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(1), 32–40.
Bargh, J. A., & Shalev, I. (2012). The Substitutability of Physical and Social Warmth in Daily Life. Emotion, 12(1), 154–162.
Blazina, C. E., Rachel, & Burridge, A., & Settle, A. (2007). The Relationship between Masculinity Ideology, Loneliness, and Separation-Individuation Difficulties. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 101–109.
Bowers, A., Wu, J., Lustig, S., & Nemecek, D. (2022). Loneliness Influences Avoidable Absenteeism and Turnover Intention Reported by Adult Workers in the United States. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9(2), 312–335.
Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Field, T. (2014). Touch. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gallup. (2025). State of the Global Workplace: 2025 Report. Washington, DC: Gallup.
IJzerman, H., Coan, J. A., Wagemans, F. M. A., Missler, M. A., Van Beest, I., Lindenberg, S., & Tops, M. (2015). A Theory of Social Thermoregulation in Human Primates. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–17.
Inagaki, T. K., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2013). Shared Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Warmth and Physical Warmth. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2272–2280.
Masi, C. M., Chen, H. Y., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 219–266.
McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., & Olausson, H. (2014). Discriminative and Affective Touch: Sensing and Feeling. Neuron, 82(4), 737–755.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting Educational Design Research. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schneegans, S., & Schöner, G. (2008). Dynamic Field Theory as a Framework for Understanding Embodied Cognition. In Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach (pp. 241–271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.