Reconciliatory Community: Mechanisms for Driving Cooperation in Conflict Resolution through Community Justice under the Dispute Mediation Act, B.E. 2562 via Community Charters in Udon Thani Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research article were to: 1) manage knowledge according to legal provisions regarding conflict resolution through community justice under the Dispute Mediation Act, B.E. 2562, 2) create a participatory draft of a community charter for conflict resolution through community justice under the Dispute Mediation Act, B.E. 2562, in Udon Thani Province, and 3) transfer collaborative mechanisms for conflict resolution through community justice under the Dispute Mediation Act, B.E. 2562, via community charters. This study employed a mixed-methods research design. The quantitative data were collected through questionnaires, while the qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Content analysis was used for data evaluation.
From the study, the following results were found: 1) People's dispute mediation centers were able to reduce interpersonal conflicts, lower expenses, and decrease the volume of court cases. The community justice centers and community charters served as mechanisms for driving cooperation to reduce conflicts within the community, with an evaluation mean score of = 3.72 (74.45%) and a standard deviation of S.D. = 1.11, interpreted at a high level. This reflects that the community held a positive view toward utilizing community charters as a mechanism for driving local dispute mediation; 2) the draft community charter functioned as a collaborative mechanism for resolving conflicts through community justice, thereby reducing disputes and fostering reconciliation. The transfer of these collaborative mechanisms was conducted through a participatory approach based on the authority of Sections 26 and 43 (1) of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. This resulted in a draft community charter for conflict resolution that aligned with the Judiciary's policy, which aimed to reduce t the number of cases entering the judicial system by promoting mediation in both criminal and civil disputes.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Boonchuay, S. (2022). The Success of Restorative Justice Operations Abroad to be Applied in Thailand. In Proceedings of the Conference on Research to Create Innovation and Technology to Support Thai Society into the Digital World (pp. 2382–2394). The 14th National Academic Conference, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University.
Chaithongkam, S. (2022). Development of Law for Mediation of Criminal Dispute at the Investigation Level. Law TSU: Journal of Law, Thaksin University, 10(12), 75–92.
Court of Justice. (2025). Report on Statistics of Court Cases for the Year 2024. Retrieved October 21, 2025, from http://www.oppb.coj.go.th
Kaewsomchat, S. (2025). Promoting Network in the Provision of Community Sector Dispute Mediation Centers Based on Buddhist Principles. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 13(4), 1755–1766.
Kakpeng, P. (2023). A Judicial Public Mediation Model for People of Sam-Ngam Subdistrict Municipality, Don Tum District, Nakhon Pathom Province. (Master’s Thesis). Thammasat University. Bangkok.
Kongcharoen, K. (2013). Acceptance of the Restorative Justice Process to Manage Community Conflicts in Chachoengsao Province. Journal of Buriram Rajabhat University: Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 17–43.
Krueasaeng, P. (2024). Management of the Public Area for Poverty Alleviation through Community Constitution in Thoen District, Lampang Province. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Review Lampang Rajabhat University, 12(3), 21–38.
Limpasert, S., Sanapath, S., Saisa-Nguan, R., & Usanno, W. (2019). Community Justice: An Alternative Justice Process in Thai Society. In Proceedings of the RSU National Academic Conference 2019 (pp. 1458–1474). Rangsit University.
Siriwattana, S. (2025). A Model for Developing Dispute Mediation in Public-Sector Dispute Mediation Centers. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 13(3), 1129–1144.
Sriphapa, A. (2015). The Development of Driving Health Constitution on Exercise Behaviors in Khok Kwang, Bueng Khla District, Bueng Kan Province. (Master’s Thesis). Mahasarakham University. Maha Sarakham.
Srisran, S., & Polpanthin, Y. (2017). The Development of Conflict Reconciliation Mediation Model by Community. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 10(1), 1959–1975.
Sukdit, P. (2018). The Mediation in Civil Cases of the Court of Justice: A Comparative Study of Thai Law and Singapore Law. In Proceedings of the Conference on Research: The Thai Legal System Is Undergoing Reform and Transformation (pp. 330–342). The 1st National Academic Conference on Jurisprudence, Faculty of Law, Chiang Mai University.
Thodsungnoen, J., & Klanthapura, O. (2014). Factors Contributing to the Success of the Community Justice Center, Mueang District, Samut Sakhon Province. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 40(1), 98–113.
Thongkhowkhum, S. (2019). Applying Restorative Justice in Dispute Resolution: Studying Mediation on Criminal Cases with Imprisonment Not Exceeding Five Years in Court. (Master’s Thesis). Thammasat University. Bangkok.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2021). Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes (2nd ed., pp. 3–15). Vienna, Austria: UNODC.
Yampochai, K. (2021). The Community Charter Development on the Elderly’s Wellness at Talat Mai Sub-District, Wiset Chai Chan District, Ang Thong Province. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 14(4), 68–79.