Security Intelligence in the Age of AI: Political Science Perspectives and Local Realities

Main Article Content

Phuwaditz Nunthasakulzit

Abstract

This academic article aims to present political science concepts to understand and apply security intelligence, particularly in politically and socially sensitive local areas. The analysis suggests that security intelligence is not limited to military dimensions or national sovereignty, but must also encompass human security, social justice, and a deep understanding of local power dynamics. In political science, intelligence is viewed as a crucial mechanism for the state to collect, analyze, and summarize information for policy decision-making at the local level. Intelligence faces challenges from power structures, political culture, and mistrustful relationships between the state and the people. This article emphasizes the need to integrate qualitative perspectives from political science into the intelligence process to ensure a realistic perception of the local situation, reduce misinterpretation, and foster trust between the state and the people. Understanding local political structures, political culture, and the role of local leaders is crucial in shaping the design and success of security intelligence. This article also analyzes new challenges in the era of artificial intelligence, viewing AI as both an opportunity to enhance big data analysis and a serious threat through information warfare and the creation of subtle disinformation. A political perspective suggests that the use of AI in intelligence must take into account state legitimacy, citizen rights, and issues of inequality. State intelligence therefore requires transparent and ethical oversight of AI technology to prevent embedded biases that could lead to discrimination or undermine local trust. Understanding these political dimensions is central to developing effective, equitable, and sustainable local security intelligence strategies that will contribute to strengthening national security overall.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nunthasakulzit, P. . (2026). Security Intelligence in the Age of AI: Political Science Perspectives and Local Realities. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 14(1), 451–460. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/293159
Section
Articles

References

Amarawikrom, P. (2025). Adaptation of Human Resources in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Academic Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, 7(1), 72–82.

Charoenrattanakul, S. (1987). Political Analysis: A Summary of the Ideas of Ten American Scholars. Bangkok: Odeon Store.

Easton, D. (1955). The Political System. New York: Knopf.

National Intelligence Agency. (2019). The Explanation of the National Intelligence Act B.E. 2562 (2019). Bangkok: National Intelligence Agency.

Nilkamhaeng, K. (2016). Information Operations and National Security. Ratthapirak Journal, 58(3), 69–78.

Péuntong, K. (2016). Guidelines for the Development of the National Intelligence Agency's Citizen News Network. Bangkok: Military Staff College, National Defense Studies Institute.

Pintobtang, P. (2015). Interest Group Political Framework of Analysis: Development, Debate and Frontier of Research. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Kasetsart University, 41(2), 1–18.

Serirangsan, Th. (2019). Political Science and Political Stability in Thailand. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Surin Rajabhat University, 21(2), 347–364.

Sinthasawat, N. (2002). The Study of Political Science from a Political Psychology Perspective. In the Teaching Materials for the Core Subjects and Methods of Political Science (Unit 8). (17th ed.). Bangkok: Chuanpim Printing House.

Siriyotha, P. (2009). The Role of the National Intelligence Agency on the Security of the Three Southern Border Provinces. (Master’s Thesis). Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. Nonthaburi.