Strengthening Integrity through Information Disclosure to Combat Corruption, Leveraging a Collaborative Network of Organizations as a Foundation
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aimed 1) to study and analyze the problems, context, necessity, and theoretical concepts related to strengthening integrity through information disclosure measures to combat corruption, using organizational collaboration networks as a foundation based on modern approaches; 2) to examine Buddhist principles relevant to the study; and 3) to provide recommendations on the issues examined. This qualitative research analyzed both domestic and international data and conducted in-depth interviews with 23 experts.
The findings revealed as follows: 1) Corruption is a major national problem with 12 key causes: abuse of power for personal gain; collusion among multiple sectors; policy-level corruption; centralized bureaucracy and patronage systems; values and cultural norms that enable corruption; economic conditions where the state serves as a source of benefits facilitating bribery; loopholes in systems and laws; insufficient protection mechanisms for whistleblowers; inadequate systems of oversight, participation, information disclosure, and public reporting; lack of knowledge and moral and ethical awareness; limitations due to the absence of integrated organizations for coordinating networks across nine institutional sectors; and imbalanced systems of incentives and penalties. Strengthening integrity can be achieved through a “two-way information disclosure” measure: the state transparently discloses information while also providing opportunities for the public to actively report misconduct and participate in oversight, thereby establishing social norms. The theories and concepts supporting integrity enhancement through information disclosure measures to combat corruption consist of 7 theories and 10 concepts. The theoretical components include altruism, social capital, social norms, transparency, agency theory, public interest disclosure, and the triune brain theory. The conceptual components include whistleblowing, whistleblower protection, the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy, ethical immunity building, integrity indicators alongside other performance indicators, governance indicators, technology-based information disclosure measures, and the F.A.I.R. Society model proposed by the researcher, which begins with a foundation of integrity and ethics, continues with transparency, is strengthened by honesty, and achieves sustainability through multi-sectoral accountability. 2) The key Buddhist principles supporting the study include the Threefold Integrity (Sujjarita), the Five Qualities of Fearlessness (Vesārajjakaraṇa-dhamma), and the Ten Royal Virtues (Dasavidha-rājadhamma). 3) The recommendations include: (1) formulating a national strategy to promote an organizational culture of integrity, transparency, and accountability; (2) strengthening collaboration among nine institutional networks, with religion as the core for cultivating values and ethics; (3) building ethical immunity in society through knowledge development; (4) establishing policies that promote integrity, transparency, and participation at all levels; (5) utilizing technology for information disclosure and monitoring; (6) applying transparency indices for evaluating information disclosure; and (7) advancing whistleblower protection laws, revising laws that hinder oversight and involve conflicts of interest, and enforcing strict penalties to deter corruption.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Beautiful Foundation. (n.d.). What We Do. Retrieved August 22, 2025, from https://www.beautifulfund.org/eng/WhatWeDo.php
Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–106.
Derrida, J. (1992). Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money (pp. 11–25). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2017). Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Hongthong, N. (2021). Analyzing Maslow’s Needs from the Perspective of Buddhism. Panithan Journal, 17(2), 127–132.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
MacLean, P. (2025). Triune Brain. Retrieved March 1, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/8Qbox
Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. (1996). Thai Tripitakas. Bangkok: MCU Press.
National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA Poll), & Sufficiency Economy Studies Center. (2024). Public Confidence in the Performance of Agencies Related to Corruption and Misconduct Cases of Government Officials. Retrieved January 14, 2024, from https://nidapoll.nida.ac.th/survey_detail?survey_id=687
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-Blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1–16.
Nimitrmongkol, M. (2024). Tackling the Problem of “Corruption” in the Public Sector: Shocking! Found That Illicit Money Surges to 500 Billion Baht per Year. Thansettakij. Retrieved January 14, 2024, from https://shorturl.asia/79ez3
OECD. (n.d.). Public Integrity Indicators. Retrieved June 4, 2025, from https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/public-integrity.html
Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission. (2024). Thailand Corruption Situation Report: Fiscal Year 2024. Bangkok: Office of the NACC.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2005). Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy. Retrieved June 6, 2025, from https://shorturl.asia/bJZDd
Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (2002). Principles of Good Governance and Public Administration. Nonthaburi: Office of the Public Sector Development Commission.
Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986). Perceiving the Community Norms of Alcohol Use among Students. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9), 961–976.
Phra Brahmapundit (P. A. Payutto). (2014). Dictionary of Buddhist Studies: Compiled Edition. Bangkok: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rothstein, B. (2011). The Quality of Government (pp. 11–14, 35–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Siroros, P., Singkaneti, B., Burikul, T., Thamronglak, A., & Intratat, M. (2022). Governance Indicators and Their Application in Thai Society. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
Tinsulanonda, P. (2012). Special Lecture at the 12th Anniversary Seminar of the Ombudsman. In Office of the Ombudsman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Anniversary Seminar of the Ombudsman (pp. 1–56). Bangkok: Office of the Ombudsman.
Transparency International. (2025a). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. Retrieved August 22, 2025, from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
Transparency International. (2025b). Thailand – Corruption Score and Ranking in CPI 2024. Retrieved August 22, 2025, from https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/thailand
UNODC. (2015). Resource Guide on Good Practices in the Protection of Reporting Persons. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Uthen, B., & Wongthanavasu, S. (2022). Public Information Disclosure Assessment Framework of Government Agencies in Thailand. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 7(5), 63–71.
V-Dem Institute. (2024). Democracy Report 2024: Democracy Winning and Losing at the Ballot? University of Gothenburg. Retrieved from https://www.vdem.net/documents/38/ vdem_dr2024_lowres.pdf
Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.