Approaches to Constructively Developing the Political Context in a Multicultural Society in the Digital Age
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to explore and enhance understanding by analyzing and explaining the interconnection between contemporary political contexts and power structures shaped by the influence of digital technology. It focuses on three dimensions: understanding multicultural society in the digital era; the nature of multiculturalism under the transformative context of digital technology; and the impact of digital disruption on communication processes, expression, and power relations in political settings.
The study reveals that digital technology has profoundly transformed the structure and forms of political communication. Citizens now have greater access to digital platforms, allowing them to obtain information, express their opinions, and participate in politics more freely and equally. This has facilitated the articulation of demands and the formation of identity-based cultural and sociopolitical groups in contemporary society. However, such freedom also brings about challenges, including the spread of disinformation, fake news, and cyber harassment. In response, the Computer-Related Crime Act B.E. 2560 (2017) serves as a legal mechanism that governs state authority and protects civil rights. Based on the findings, the article proposes strategies for fostering a constructive political environment in a digital multicultural society. These include developing laws and policies that safeguard civil liberties; promoting understanding and peaceful coexistence to create safe spaces for digital multicultural communities; and advancing ethics and accountability through media literacy, the promotion of creative content, and encouraging responsible political participation based on rational discourse and mutual respect. These approaches are essential for building a truly equitable and sustainable democracy in the age of digital disruption.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Davis, C. H., & Zboralska, E. (2018). Cultural Policy in the Time of Digital Disruption. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331943291
Duangwises, N. (2021). A Critique of Cultural Essentialism in the Multicultural Molicy of the Thai State. Journal of Anthropology, 4(1), 117-155.
Hada, R. et al. (2022). Beyond Digital "Echo Chambers": The Role of Viewpoint Diversity in Political Discussion. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09056
Khumsamart, S. et al. (2020). The Guidelines for Educational Administration in the Digital Distribution Era. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 5(3), 243-259.
Khwayota, B., & Mingwong, A. (2025). The Regulation of Digital Platforms by State Agencies and the Rule of Law: A Case Study on Section 20 of the Computer-Related Crime Act B.E. 2560 (2017). Modern Academic Development and Promotion Journal, 3(2), 535-547.
Office of the Royal Society. (2012). Culture. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from http://legacy.orst.go.th/?knowledges=วัฒนธรรม-๗-สิงหาคม-๒๕๕๕
Pariyatmethi, P. T., & Nantamas, P. P. (2025). Political Participation in the Digital Age. Journal of Buddhist Innovation and Management, 8(1), 222-233.
Phathong, P. et al. (2019). Political Culture: Concepts to Development of Thai Society. Journal of Graduate Studies Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya Khonkaen Campus, 6(2), 14-27.
Prapasanobol, A. (2016). A Critical Reflection of Digital Culture from Philosophy of Education of Paulo Freire. Panitan Journal, 12(1), 78-97.
Rugsajai, N., & Pongsawat, P. (2023). Online Political Communication via TikTok Platform to Oppose the Government During 2020-2021. Governance Journal, 12(2), 35-68.
Shome, R. (2012). Mapping the Limits of Multiculturalism in the Context of Globalization. International Journal of Communication, 6, 144-165. Retrieved May 9, 2025, from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1222
Surinthranon, S., & Varaphon, T. (2019). Political Culture and Online Social Network Effecting Thai Democratization. UMT Poly Journal, 16(1), 511-519.
Taneerat, W., & Dongnadeng, H. A. (2024). Digital Political Behavior of Generation Z in Thailand. Southeast Asian Studies, 13(3). Retrieved May 9, 2025, from https://englishkyoto-seas.org/2024/12/vol-13-no-3
Thamthanapat, C. et al. (2023). The Model Integration of Kalamasuta for Strengthening the Multicultural Society in the Digital Age. Journal of Buddhamagga, 8(1), 266-276.
Tylor, E. B. (1877). Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Religion, Language, Art and Custom. New York: Henry Holt.
Ubpanong, P. et al. (2022). Digital Citizens and the Dimensions of Political and Social Engagement. Journal of Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Thepsatri Rajbahat University, 13(2), 173-185.
United Nations. (2023). Cultural Diversity in the Digital Aage: A Pillar for Sustainable Development. UN Chronicle. Retrieved May 9, 2025, from https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/cultural-diversity-digital-age-pillar-sustainable-development
Wisuttho, P. (2022). Political Communication in the Digital Age. Journal of Local Governance and Innovation, 6(1), 109-119.