Peace Innovation for Integrity Ecosystems Development Enhancing Integrity and Transparency Assessment: ITA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article consisted of the following objectives: 1) To study the factors of the ecosystems favorable to integrity organizations, as well as the related concepts; and 2) To present peace innovation for developing an ecosystems of integrity organizations in order to enhance the integrity and transparency assessment. The study used mixed-method research comprising qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative data were collected by documentary method, in-depth interviews with 32 persons, focus group discussion with 8 person, feedback evaluation form of ITA users with 20 agencies. The obtained data were analyzed by inductive method, mean, and standard deviation.
From the study, the following results are found: 1) The factors of the ecosystems favorable to integrity organizations, it was found in leadership, directions, strategies, the assignment of responsible agencies, digital technology for work and service, personnel, integrity culture and communication integrity perception. Concepts used to enhance an ecosystem that is favorable to the integrity organization include concepts of new public management, the development of the current bureaucratic system, an ecosystem of organization, and the organization’s culture. Padhāna (effort) is a Buddhist peaceful means of developing an integrity organization. 2) An integrity organization ecosystems is an integrated relationship of organization and management. There is a leader in conveying shared values. There are departments related to the internal and external environment to promote and support. Padhāna (effort) is a Buddhist peaceful means of developing an integrity organization and reform work with a modern system. The body of knowledge obtained from the study consists of 7 components, 3 approaches, 3 goals they called ‘Peace Innovation for Integrity Ecosystems Transformation.’
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service Serving, Not Steering. London: Imprint Routledge.
Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2022). Strategic Management in Public Services Organizations Concepts, Schools and Contemporary Issues. London: Imprint Routledge.
Hood, Ch. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1991), 3-19.
National Strategy Secretariat Office, Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2018). National Strategy 2018-2037. Bangkok: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board.
______. (2021). Reform Plan. Bangkok: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board.
Office of the National Anti - Corruption Commission. (2020). Buddhist Teachings and Anti-Corruption Curriculum (Anti–Corruption Education). Nonthaburi: Office of the National Anti - Corruption Commission.
______. (2023). Corruption Situation Report. Nonthaburi: Office of the National Anti - Corruption Commission.
______. (2023). Integrity and Transparency Assessment Manual 2023. Nonthaburi: Office of the National Anti - Corruption Commission.
Phramaha Hansa Dhammahaso. (2013). Buddhist Peaceful Means: Integrating Principles and Conflict Management Tools. Bangkok: 21 Century.
