Dhamma and Mediation in Criminal Cases
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article aimed to reflect the Dhamma conducive to mediation of criminal cases in the Court of Appeal. The data were collected from Buddhist texts, documents, research works, and Buddhist experts' opinions on concepts, processes, and methods of acting as a mediator. Mediators act as coaches, providing solutions to both parties to the conflict and offenders, as well as easing the suffering of victims and their families. Mediators must offer guidelines and practices that are identity and consistent with the Dhamma in order to facilitate criminal case mediation, with Ariyasacca (the four noble truths) functioning as the meditation framework. The principles and concepts of the mediation process are currently used at the Thai Court of Justice, both the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal. Mediators are chosen to work as a middle person to mediate the dispute and assist the Court of Justice. Both parties to the conflict have the right to make their own decisions, but if they can reach an agreement, it will save money and time, reduce the number of cases in court, and maintain the relationship of both parties. Mediators do not have arbitrary powers and must retain their impartiality by thinking positively, behaving respectfully, and keeping secrets. According to Buddhism, mediators must attempt to moderate both parties' emotions, alleviate unwholesome actions, and promote reasonable thought. This requires having mindfulness, contemplation, carefulness, tranquility, and loving-kindness. This is one of the components of Tisikkhā (the threefold learning), which is an important Dhamma to cultivate the mind and eliminate defilements. Tisikkhā, which consists of Sīla (precepts), Samādhi (concentration), and Paññā (wisdom), serves as a base for coexistence in society, involving practice, mental development, and attaining enlightenment. As a result, mediators will be able to practice the Dhamma more successfully and effectively mediate criminal cases using Buddhist peaceful means. The use of Dhamma in mediation is a significant component that is appropriate for mediation of criminal cases in the Court of Appeal.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Buddhadasa Bhikkhu. (1991). Life Solution. Bangkok: Sangdhram Publishing.
Court of Justice. (2019). Regulations of the Executive Committee of the Court of Justice on Conciliation of Criminal Disputes B.E. 2560. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://library.coj.go.th/ebook.html?bid=49583&fid=48638#page/2
Kittayarak, K. (2020). Justice Next Challenges: New Challenges for the Thai Justice System. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://www.the101.world/kittipong-kittayarak-one-on-one/
Limprangsi, S. (2009). Restorative Mediation in Criminal Case. (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Thana Press Co., Ltd.
National Strategy 2018-2037. (2018). Royal Thai Government Gazette V 135 (82) a, October 13, 2018.
Office of the Judiciary Executive Committee. (2019). Regulations of the Executive Committee of the Court of Justice on Conciliation of Criminal Disputes B.E. 2560. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://library.coj.go.th/ebook.html?bid=49583&fid=48638
Phra Brahmagunabhorn (P.A. Payutto). (2001). Buddhadharma Original Edition. (11th ed.). Bangkok: Saha Dhammak Printing Co., Ltd.
______. (2013). Dictionary of Buddhism. Bangkok: Pali Dhamma Publishing Company.
______. (2016). Dictionary of Buddhism. Bangkok: Pali Dhamma Publishing Company.
Phuriwikrai, K. (2020). Sustainable Dispute Resolution Through Restorative Justice. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://www.the101.world/handbook-on-restorative-justice/
Recommendations of the President of the Supreme Court on Guidelines for the Treatment of Victims in Criminal Cases B.E. 2563. (2020). Royal Thai Government Gazette V 137 (92) a, November 6, 2020.
Requirements of the President of the Supreme Court on Mediation (No. 2), B.E. 2560. (2017). Royal Thai Government Gazette V 134 (68) a, June 30, 2017.
Royal Institute. (2013). Royal Institute Dictionary. Bangkok: Sirivatana Interprint Public Company Limited.
Sutanun, S. (2016). Religious Principles and Mediation: A Solution to the Problem. (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Dispute Settlement Office Court of Justice.
Thanyasiri, P. (2021). Knowledge and Understanding of People on the Role of Community Justice Center to Strengthen Reconciliation and Peaceful Culture for Provincial Justice Offices’ Pilot, the Ministry of Justice. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/papojournal/article/view/253562/171657
The Court of Justice of Thailand. (2021). Strategic Plan of the Court of Justice B.E. 2018 -2021. Bangkok: Office of the Judiciary.
______. (2022). Strategic Plan of the Court of Justice B.E. 2022 -2025. Bangkok: Office of the Judiciary.
Uthaithani Provincial Court. (2019). Regulations of the Office of the Court of Justice on Dispute Mediation According to Dispute Mediation Act B.E. 2562. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://uttc.coj.go.th/th/content/category/detail/id/9875/cid/9876/iid/178828
Yuprasert, P. (2011). Techniques, Psychology and Communication for Mediation. Bangkok: Dispute Settlement Office Court of Justice.