A Model of Factors Affecting the Sales and Service Business on Computer Equipment and Software in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aimed to present the working capital management model and the size of company relationship affecting the company's profitability for the Systems Integrator Technology Company in Thailand with mixed methods. Relationships, the group's financial executives focused on the view of working capital management, GCG, working capital management policy and focus on the size of company are regulated as variables of working capital management that influence the company's profitability. Group interview of 10 as financial executives, and Financial Statement 391company. As to quantitative research, the relationship between performance, working capital management and profitability, examined using correlation and analysis regressions by analyzing variability study the impact of working capital management on profitability. Average Perseverance Coefficient Analysis of structural equation models is defined as a research model associated with empirical data with the LISREL to determine the harmony of the research model with empirical data. The results of this research were found that the relationship model swelled by the concept and the theory involved is not consistent with empirical data. Therefore, the researchers have implemented the model adjustment based on the adjustment instructions, allowing them to relax the initial agreement, giving the value of discrepancies. The model has changed in a better direction. It found that values x2 = 134.335, df =110, p-value = 0.0573, CFI = 0.990, RMSEA = 0.024 and SRMR= 0.033 showed that model editing to align with empirical data with such methods works quite well and does not correct the theory concepts and theories used in research.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Gill, A., & Biger, N. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Working Capital Management Efficiency of American Manufacturing Firms. Managerial Finance, 39, 116-132.
Amarjit, G. et al. (2010). Implication of Working Capital Management Policy, Firm’s size and Financial Leverage on Financial Performance. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 3(5), 1-12.
Asghar, A., & Syed, A. A. (2012). Working Capital Management: Is It Really Affects the Profitability? Evidence from Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Business, 12(17), 74-78.
Biger, N., Nguyen, N. V., & Hoang, Q. X. (2008). The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from Vietnam. International Finance Review, 8, 307-326.
Onaolapo, O., & Onaolapo, K. (2010). Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 25, 70-82.
Roquebert, P., Westfall, S., & Zaralis. (2013). Corporate Performance Interpretation and Measuring Problem. New York: Swinger International.
Afza, T., & Hussain, A. (2011). Determinants of Capital Structure: A Case Study of Automobile Sector of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(10), 219-230.
U-on, W. (2010). Research and Searching For Business Data. Bangkok: Sripatum University.
Bei, Z., & Wijewardana. (2012). Working Capital Policy Practice. Evidence from Sri Lankan Companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 695-700.
Al-Qaisi, K. (2010). The Capital Structure Choice of Listed Firms on Two Stock Markets and One Country. The Business Review, Cambridge, 16(2), 155-160.