The Assessment of International Curriculum on Business Administration of the Private Higher Education Institutions
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article aimed at assessing the international curriculum on business administration of the private higher education institutions by employing the CIPPIEST Model for the assessment. The model comprised 8 aspects, namely, contexts, input factors, production process, products, impacts, effectiveness, sustainability, and knowledge transfer. A sample group was in a total of 569 persons consisting of 100 administrators and personnel, 269 Chinese students, 100 Chinese alumni, and 100 employers of the Chinese graduates. The assessment instrument was a questionnaire with the reliability equal to 0.97. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentage, average, standard deviation (S.D.), and content analysis. The research results revealed as follows: 1) The aspect of context is overall found to have suitability at a high level; 2) The aspect of input factors is overall found to have suitability at a high level; 3) The aspect of production process is overall found to have suitability at a high level; 4) The aspect of products is overall found to have suitability at a high level; 5) The aspect of impacts is overall found to have suitability at a high level; 6) The aspect of effectiveness is overall found to have suitability at a high level; 7) The aspect of sustainability is overall found to have suitability at a high level; and 8) The aspect of knowledge transfer is overall found to have suitability at a high level. From the assessment of the international curriculum on business administration of the private higher education institutions, it can be concluded that all administrators, lecturers, personnel, Chinese students, Chinese alumni, employers of the Chinese graduates have consistent opinions that the international undergraduate program has suitability at a high level.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Boonsukkaew, J. (2018). The network office International study of Thai, Chinese. Interview. October, 5.
Chareonwongsak, K. (2008). Language skills, an important factor in studying abroad. Retrieved November 8, 2017, from http://www.kriengsak.com/node/1404.
Chinpanyakun, T. et al. (2017). Assessment of the new curriculum: CIPPIEST format. Journal of the Police, 9(2), 211.
Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essential of Psychology and Education. New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
Ferguson, G. A. (1981). Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. (5th ed.). New Yok: McGraw – Hill.
Hirunsuk, N., & Pincharoen, S. (2013). Graduate opinions about participation issues. And do not participate in student activities, affecting work behavior after graduation. Business Journal Review, 5(1), 112.
Khon Kaen University. (2016). University ranking criteria. Retrieved November 23, 2017, from https://plan.kku.ac.th/pln2013/files/Ranking2016.pdf
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology North Bangkok. (2009). The organization of happiness. Journal of Insurance News The quality of King Mongkut's Institute of Technology North Bangkok, 198, 28-39.
Kupongsak, N. (2012). Problems of using Thai language of international students: a case study of Chinese students at Bangkok University. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from https://www.tcithaijo.org/index.php/huru/article/view/25645.
Lertgrai, P. et al. (2019). Innovation management for organizational development. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 6(8), 3755.
Likert, R.A. (1932). Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Arch Psychological, 25(140), 1–55.
Oliva P.F. (2009). Developing the Curriculum. (3rd ed.). New York : Harper Collins.
Ornstein, A.C., & Hunkins, F.P. (1993). Curriculum: Foundation, Principles and Issue. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Permgrasorn, N. (2008). Problems of Thai language usage of Chinese students studying Thai as a foreign language. Retrieved February 2, 2018, from http://digi.library.tu.ac.th/index/0027/8-Nov-2551/06PAGE146-PAGE159.pdf
Pongkhaphat, T. (2004). State University. Vision for reform. Matichon Daily, 12(9560), 6.
Ritcharoon, P. (2015). Course evaluation: Concepts Process and use of evaluation results. Thammasat Education. Journal, 8(1), 27.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation: Theory, models and applications.
(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
_______. (2007). Evaluation: Theory, models and applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Suddan, W., Chomhongphiphat, P., & MamKhokSung, P. (2013). Strategies to Promote Participation in Curriculum Support Activities of Students. Kasetsart University Chaloem Phrakiat Campus Sakon Nakhon province. Journal of Nakhon Phanom University, 3(3), 27-32.
Sukanin, J. (2018). Saisampan School. Interview. September, 12.
Sutika, M. et al. (2019). Outcomes of the industrial education curriculum: a study through the perspective of graduates. Education Chiang Mai University, 3(1), 21.
Wongyai, W. (2011). Curriculum development in higher education. (2nd ed.). Bangkok:
R and Print Company Limited.
Xia, H. (2018). Thai-Chinese Personnel Exchange. Interview. August, 20.
