Casual Factors Influencing Organizational Performance of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were 1) to study influences of organizational culture, information technology, change management and organizational innovation on organizational performance of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, and 2) to create a structural equation model, which describes the casual factors influencing the organizational performance of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. This research was the quantitative research. The samples were 438 executives and employees from Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. This sample size was determined based on the criterion of 20 times the observed variables, selected via stratified sampling. Data were collected by a questionnaire and were analyzed by descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling. The research findings revealed that 1) organizational culture, information technology, change management and organizational innovation had an influence on organizational performance of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, with a .001 level of statistical significance in a positive direction, and 2) the structural equation model, which described the casual factors influencing organizational performance of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, developed by researcher, conformed to the empirical data at the high level. Furthermore, these findings can be helpful for enhancing organizational performance and applied as guidelines for managing and improving the operations of the organizations in the Thai power industry to achieve operational excellence and sustainability under the context of the rapid development of the power industry.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
References
Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234–262.
Ali, M., Seny Kan, K. A., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5317–5323.
Astuti, E. (2018). The influence of information technology strategy and management support to the internal business process, competitive advantage, financial and non-financial performance of the company. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 14(3).
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. . Retrieved May 3, 2017, from https://www.wiley.com/enus/Diagnosing+and+Changing+Organizational+Culture%3A+Based+on+the+Competing+Values+Framework%2C+Revised+Edition-p-9781118047057
Chen, Z. et al. (2018). Fit between Organizational Culture and Innovation Strategy: Implications for Innovation Performance. Sustainability, 10(10), 3378.
Chiu, C.-N., & Yang, C.-L. (2018). Competitive Advantage and Simultaneous Mutual Influences between Information Technology Adoption and Service Innovation: Moderating Effects of Environmental Factors.
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, 49(C), 192-205.
De Waal, A., Goedegebuure, R., & Tan Akaraborworn, C. (2014). Adapting the high performance organization framework to the Thai context. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(2), 28–38.
De Waal, A., & Wang, A. (2017). Applicability of the high performance organization (HPO) framework in the Chinese context: The case of a state-owned enterprise. Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management, 8(1), 22–39.
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. (2018). Strategic Plan 2019 – 2020. Nonthaburi: n.p.
Evans, J., Allan, N., & Cantle, N. (2017). A new insight into the world economic forum global risks. Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy, 36(2), 185-197.
Hair, J.F. et al. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Honyenuga, B. Q., Tuninga, R. S. J., & Ghijsen, P. W. T. (2019). Management innovation and organisational performance: the mediating role of high performance organisation framework. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 22(3), 295.
Jick, T. D., & Sturtevant, K. D. M. (2017). Taking Stock of 30 Years of Change Management: Is It Time for a Reboot?. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 33–79.
Khatoon, S., & Farooq, A. (2016). Impact of Organizational Change on Organizational Performance. Global Journal of Management And Business Research, 16(3), 1-12.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2019). Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), 527-547.
Patyal, V. S., & Koilakuntla, M. (2018). Impact of organizational culture on quality management practices: an empirical investigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(5).
Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44–55.
Rezaei, G. et al. (2016). Relationship between culture of excellence and organisational performance in Iranian manufacturing companies. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(1-2), 94–115.
Ketasingh, W. (2002). Statistical Analysis for Research. (5th ed). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
