Buddhist Hermeneutics on Essence of Mind in the Process of Wisdom Development
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research are as followings: 1) to study the process of wisdom development in western and Buddhist philosophies; 2) to study the Essence of Mind (or Original Mind) in Zen and Theravada Buddhist philosophies; 3) to study western and Buddhist hermeneutics as the tools of dissertation; 4) to apply Buddhist hermeneutics on the Essence of Mind in the process of wisdom development; and 5) to build a body of knowledge and a platform in the process of other developments. It is a qualitative research on the study of humanities through dialectic and discursive methods under the analytic, appreciative, and applicative approaches.
The results of research are the followings: 1) the process of wisdom development in western and Buddhist philosophies shows a relation between epistemology and sources for the arising of right view;
2) the Essence of Mind in Zen Buddhist philosophy is highly significant to the Passive State of Mind (or Subconscious Mind) in Theravada Buddhist philosophy;
3) the western hermeneutics is originally a religious interpretation, after that, it has evolved to epistemology in postmodernism. For Buddhist hermeneutics, it is a theory of interactionism which uses in this research is the skillful means;
4) an application of the Buddhist hermeneutics on the Essence of Mind in the process of wisdom development has been divided into two levels: 1) Worldly Wisdom or Ethical; 2) Transcendental Wisdom or Truthful. These levels are based on a theory of Skillful Means, i.e. Koan, Zazen, and Mondo as tools of getting the Essence of Mind;
5) a new body of knowledge in the process of wisdom development has been divided into three parts: 1) Zen Dialectic of Non-duality; 2) Relation between Bodhisattva Ideals and Wisdom/Dhamma 2; and 3) Zen Hermeneutical Theory.
Article Details
Views and opinions expressed in the articles published by The Journal of MCU Peace Studies, are of responsibility by such authors but not the editors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.